Home Blog Page 14

GTEC Releases List of 100 Unrecognised Universities as of August 2026

August 29, 2026

GTEC has released a list of 100 universities and institutions it does not recognise as of August 28, 2026. See the full list and what prospective students should know.

Category: News → Higher Education
Hub: Study in Ghana → Universities in Ghana
Article Type: Breaking Education News
Published: August 29, 2026
Source: Ghana Tertiary Education Commission (GTEC), as reported by MyJoyOnline

Article Information

Item	Details
Article Title	GTEC Releases List of 100 Unrecognised Universities as of August 2026
Regulatory Body	Ghana Tertiary Education Commission (GTEC)
Date of Notice	August 28, 2026
Number Listed	100 institutions
Main Concern	Recognition and quality assurance
Advice to Public	Exercise due diligence before enrolling
Geographical Coverage	Ghana and international institutions
Article Type	Breaking Education News

Fact Check & Editorial Review

GTEC has issued a public notice dated August 28, 2026, concerning institutions it does not recognise.

The list reproduced below is based on the information published by MyJoyOnline and attributed to GTEC’s latest public notice. The designation “unrecognised” should not automatically be interpreted as a finding that every institution is fraudulent. Recognition, accreditation and legal authority to operate are matters that should be checked directly with the relevant regulator.

Prospective students, parents and employers should therefore verify the recognition status of an institution and the acceptability of its qualifications before making financial or academic commitments.

Editorial note: The source material supplied for this article contains 100 entries, but some names and descriptions may require clarification against GTEC’s original notice. EducateGhana.com recommends checking the official GTEC register before publishing any institutional status as a definitive claim.

Key Takeaways

GTEC has published a list of 100 institutions it does not recognise as of August 28, 2026.
The institutions listed are located in Ghana and several other countries.
GTEC has advised the public to exercise due diligence regarding certificates issued by the listed institutions.
The list includes institutions described as universities, colleges, business schools, theological institutions and other education providers.
Being listed as unrecognised means prospective students should not assume that qualifications will be recognised in Ghana.
Students should verify institutional status directly with GTEC before paying fees or enrolling.
Employers and institutions requiring academic qualifications should also verify certificates presented by graduates.
The list can change, so readers should rely on the latest GTEC publication or register when making important decisions.

Introduction

The Ghana Tertiary Education Commission (GTEC) has released an updated list of 100 universities and other tertiary-level institutions that it does not recognise, according to a public notice dated August 28, 2026.

The development has implications for Ghanaian students seeking university education locally or internationally, particularly those considering institutions that operate largely through online or distance-learning arrangements.

GTEC has advised members of the public to exercise due diligence regarding certificates issued by the institutions appearing on the list.

The warning is particularly important for students who intend to use their qualifications for employment, further studies, professional licensing or public-sector recruitment in Ghana.

Why GTEC’s List Matters to Students

Recognition of an institution is an important consideration when choosing where to study.

A student may spend several years completing a programme and significant amounts of money on tuition, only to discover later that the qualification cannot be used for a particular purpose in Ghana.

This is especially important where students are considering institutions operating across national borders or institutions that advertise distance, online or alternative forms of higher education.

GTEC’s warning therefore gives prospective students a reason to verify an institution’s status before making payments or submitting applications.

➡ Related: [Universities in Ghana: Complete Guide to Accredited Institutions]
➡ Related: [How to Check University Accreditation and Recognition in Ghana]

What GTEC Is Warning the Public About

According to the public notice reported by MyJoyOnline, GTEC advised the public to exercise due diligence concerning certificates issued by the institutions listed.

The warning does not mean that prospective students should simply rely on advertisements, social media pages or claims made by education agents.

Students should independently verify whether an institution is recognised and whether the specific programme they intend to study has the necessary approval.

Recognition of an institution and recognition of a particular programme can also involve different considerations.

➡ Related: [GTEC Accreditation in Ghana: What Students Must Know]
➡ Related: [How to Avoid Fake Universities and Unrecognised Degrees]

Full List of the 100 Institutions

The following is the list reproduced from the report supplied by MyJoyOnline.

No.	Institution	Country/Location
1	Universidad Azteca	Mexico
2	Indian School of Management and Studies	India
3	Breyer State Theology University	USA
4	Debest College of Science, Arts and Business	Ghana
5	Osiri University	USA
6	Atlantic International University	USA
7	Faith University Seminary (FUS)	Ghana
8	Christian University College Monrovia	Liberia
9	Rhema Bible Training College (RBTC)	USA
10	Universidad Empresarial de Costa Rica	Costa Rica
11	Selinus University of Sciences and Literature	Italy
12	Crown University International Chartered	USA
13	Monarch Business School	Switzerland
14	City University	Cambodia
15	Kesmond International University	USA
16	Washington University of Barbados	Barbados
17	London Academy of Technology and Management	UK
18	IICSE University	USA
19	Doxa Open University	Ghana
20	Brainae University	USA
21	University of Haana	Germany
22	Christian Leadership University	USA
23	International Institute of Church Management Inc.	USA
24	Electrical and Mechanical Engineering Training School	Ghana
25	Louisiana Baptist University & Seminary	USA
26	Tech Global University	Andorra
27	International Christian University	Nigeria
28	LIGS University	Hawaii, USA
29	Swiss Management Centre University	Switzerland
30	Quest International University	Ghana
31	Isles International University	Ireland
32	Kingsnow University	USA
33	New Life Bible College and Seminary	USA
34	East Bridge University	France
35	Texila American University	Guyana
36	Vision International University	USA
37	Keisie International University	USA
38	Dublin Metropolitan University	UK/Cyprus
39	Logos University	USA
40	University of America	USA
41	Kazian School of Management	India
42	University of Northwest	USA
43	Akamai University	Hawaii, USA
44	Trinity Graduate School of Apologetics and Theology (TGSAT)	India
45	American Bible University	USA
46	California Creek University	USA
47	Delta International University	USA
48	National Institute of Business Management (NIBM)	India
49	Southern California International University	USA
50	Quetzalcoatl University of Veracruz	Mexico
51	Swiss International Management Academy	Switzerland
52	IIBM Institute of Management	India
53	Dunster Business School	Switzerland
54	World Academy for Research and Development (WARD)	UK
55	American Management University	USA
56	All Nations Church International University	Texas, USA
57	Freedom University and Theological Seminary	USA
58	Global Theological University	USA
59	Jorasome International University	Zambia
60	Kingdom Living Bible Institute	Kumasi, Ghana
61	Global Professional College	Effiduase, Ghana
62	London School of Management and Technology (LSMT)	UK
63	European Institute of Management and Technology	Switzerland
64	Volta University College	Ghana/Nigeria
65	United Nigeria University College	Nigeria
66	Open International University	Nigeria
67	Marquis Open University	Italy
68	Alliance International University	Zambia
69	All Saints American University	Liberia
70	Colombia International University	USA
71	American Management University	USA
72	University of the Nations	Hawaii
73	Brookside University	Barbados
74	Pacific International University	USA
75	American University of Sovereign Nations	USA
76	Brussels Capital University	Türkiye
77	Richmond Open University	Nigeria
78	Freie und Private Universität Herisa	Switzerland
79	OAA Consulting Limited	Kumasi, Ghana
80	Competency School of Business Administration (COSBA)	Kumasi, Ghana
81	Manchester Open University	UK
82	Institute of Management and Engineering	India
83	Vocational University	Delhi, India
84	Indian Institute of Alternative Medicine	India
85	Logos University Global	USA/France
86	West African Christian University	Nigeria
87	Coastal University	Nigeria
88	ESM, École de Management et de Communication	Switzerland
89	Swiss School of Business and Management (SSBM)	Switzerland
90	European Centre for Education in Business and Sciences (ECEBiS)	Malta
91	Reagan National University	USA
92	Trinity International University of Ambassadors	USA
93	Global Executive College	Ghana
94	Christian Life School of Theology Global	USA
95	Indian Management School and Research Centre	India
96	Hillsville University	USA
97	Northwestern Christian University	Kenya
98	University of Muchinga	Zambia
99	Yesbud University	Zambia
100	Global Academy of Finance and Management (GAFM)	USA

Important: The source text contains American Management University twice, at positions 55 and 71. This duplication is retained from the supplied list rather than silently altering the reported source.

Several Ghana-Based Institutions Appear on the List

The list includes a number of institutions identified as being in Ghana.

Among them are Debest College of Science, Arts and Business, Faith University Seminary, Doxa Open University, Electrical and Mechanical Engineering Training School, Quest International University, Kingdom Living Bible Institute, Global Professional College, Volta University College, OAA Consulting Limited, COSBA and Global Executive College.

For prospective students, the inclusion of a Ghana-based institution on a regulatory warning list deserves particular attention.

Before enrolling, applicants should confirm directly with GTEC whether the institution is authorised to operate and whether the programme being offered has the required approval.

➡ Related: [List of Accredited Universities in Ghana]
➡ Related: [GTEC: How to Verify a Tertiary Institution in Ghana]

International Institutions Also Feature Heavily

A large proportion of the institutions on the list are associated with countries outside Ghana.

The list includes institutions identified with the United States, United Kingdom, India, Switzerland, Nigeria, Zambia, Liberia, Barbados, Mexico, France, Italy, Canada-related jurisdictions and several other locations.

This is particularly relevant to Ghanaian students attracted by international online degree programmes.

A university’s use of an international address or an impressive-sounding institutional name does not, by itself, establish that its qualification will be accepted by Ghanaian authorities.

Students should therefore verify recognition before enrolling.

What Students Should Do Before Paying Fees

Students considering any institution should undertake several checks before paying tuition.

First, verify the institution’s status through the relevant regulatory authority.

Second, confirm that the specific programme is approved where programme-level approval is applicable.

Third, establish whether the qualification can be used for the student’s intended purpose in Ghana.

For example, a student intending to use a degree for public-sector employment, professional registration or admission to another Ghanaian university should confirm its acceptability before enrolling.

Students should also keep copies of admission letters, receipts, programme information and correspondence with the institution.

What About Degrees Already Obtained?

The GTEC notice specifically advises the public to exercise due diligence concerning certificates issued by the listed institutions.

Graduates who already hold qualifications from an institution on the list should therefore avoid making assumptions about the status of their certificates.

Instead, they should seek clarification from GTEC or the relevant authority concerning their individual qualification and intended use.

This is particularly important for graduates preparing documents for employment, further studies, professional registration or credential evaluation.

Why Students Should Be Careful With Online Universities

Online education has expanded access to higher education across national boundaries.

However, the convenience of online study also creates challenges for students trying to determine whether an institution is properly recognised in their home country.

Some institutions may have websites, international addresses, certificates and academic programmes that appear credible to prospective students.

Those features alone do not settle the question of recognition.

The safest approach is to verify the institution with the appropriate regulatory authority before paying fees.

How to Verify a University Before Enrolling

Step 1: Check GTEC

Students in Ghana should first check the institution’s recognition status through GTEC.

Step 2: Check the Home-Country Regulator

For an overseas university, students should also check the regulator responsible for higher education in the country where the institution claims to operate.

Step 3: Verify the Programme

Do not stop at the university’s institutional status. Check whether the particular programme is recognised or accredited where applicable.

Step 4: Ask About Certificate Recognition

If you intend to use the qualification in Ghana, confirm whether it can be accepted for employment, further education or professional purposes.

Step 5: Keep Evidence

Retain official correspondence and documentation concerning recognition, admission, fees and the programme.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is GTEC?

The Ghana Tertiary Education Commission is Ghana’s regulatory body responsible for important aspects of tertiary education, including institutional oversight and quality assurance.

How many institutions are on the August 2026 list?

The report identifies 100 institutions.

Does being on the list automatically mean an institution is fake?

Not necessarily. The appropriate conclusion from the notice is that the institution is not recognised by GTEC in the context stated by the Commission. Students should seek clarification where necessary.

Can I study at an institution outside Ghana and use the certificate in Ghana?

Possibly, depending on the institution, qualification, recognition status and purpose for which the certificate will be used. Students should verify this before enrolling.

What should I do if I have already graduated from a listed institution?

Seek guidance from GTEC and the relevant professional or educational authority before using the qualification for a specific purpose.

Editorial Perspective

The latest GTEC warning reinforces an important principle in tertiary education: students should verify recognition before committing money and years of study to a programme.

The rapid growth of international and online education has made it easier for students to access institutions outside their home countries. It has also made quality assurance more complicated.

For Ghanaian students, the cost of verification is small compared with the financial and professional consequences of obtaining a qualification that cannot be used for its intended purpose.

As Ferdinand Ellis (2026) notes, prospective students should treat accreditation and recognition as part of the admission decision itself, rather than something to investigate after graduation.

Final Advice to Students and Parents

If you are considering a university in Ghana or abroad, do not pay fees simply because an institution has a website, international address, attractive programme or claims of global recognition.

Check the institution.

Check the programme.

Check the regulator.

Then make your decision.

For the most reliable information, students should consult the latest official GTEC publications before making an enrolment decision.

Sources

Ghana Tertiary Education Commission. (2026, August 28). Public notice on unrecognised tertiary institutions. GTEC.

MyJoyOnline. (2026, August 29). Check out the list of 100 universities not recognised by GTEC as of August 2026. Multimedia Group Limited.

Ellis, F. (2026). GTEC recognition, university accreditation and student decision-making in Ghana. EducateGhana.com.

Should Admission to Colleges of Education Be Capped in Ghana? 2026 Policy Analysis

Ferdinand Ellis

August 29, 2026

By Ferdinand Ellis | EducateGhana.com
Last Updated: August 29, 2026

Article Information Box

Information	Details
Article Type	Education Policy Editorial / Research Analysis
Category	Research
Research Focus	Teacher Education, Admissions and Workforce Planning
Main Issue	Whether Ghana should regulate admission numbers into Colleges of Education
Institutions Concerned	Public Colleges of Education, GES, MoE, GTEC, NTC and PRINCOF
Geographical Coverage	Ghana
Policy Period	2026 and beyond
Author	Ferdinand Ellis
Editorial Position	Policy analysis and proposal
Evidence Status	Based on available institutional and publicly reported evidence

Fact Check & Editorial Review

This article examines a policy question rather than presenting a predetermined conclusion.

Current evidence confirms that Ghana has 49 public Colleges of Education. The public Colleges offer four-year Bachelor of Education programmes, while teacher education is linked to professional licensing and subsequent employment within a wider education-sector workforce system.

The National Service Authority reported in March 2026 that 14,349 eligible trained teachers had been issued PIN codes for the 2026/27 national service year from 36 Colleges that had submitted their class lists. This provides an indication of the scale of annual teacher preparation, although national-service numbers should not automatically be treated as the exact number of annual College of Education graduates.

There is also evidence of a significant employment challenge. In May 2026, the Ghana National Association of Teachers reported that more than 100,000 qualified teachers from Colleges of Education and other tertiary institutions remained without jobs, while calling for an expansion of government recruitment.

In 2025, Deputy Finance Minister Thomas Nyarko Ampem also reported a large backlog of unemployed education professionals and said government faced a substantial fiscal burden if the accumulated backlog were absorbed into the public sector.

These figures require careful interpretation. Graduates from Colleges of Education do not constitute the entire population of unemployed education professionals, and not every trained teacher necessarily seeks employment in the Ghana Education Service.

The central policy question therefore is not simply whether Ghana is producing “too many teachers.” It is whether teacher-training capacity, admission decisions, teacher demand, public recruitment and national education planning are sufficiently connected.

Introduction

Every year, thousands of young Ghanaians apply to Colleges of Education hoping to become professional teachers.

For many families, the College of Education remains one of the most accessible routes into tertiary education and professional employment. For communities, Colleges of Education are important economic and educational institutions. For Ghana, they are essential to the preparation of teachers who will eventually teach millions of children.

Yet a difficult question is increasingly demanding attention.

How many teachers should Ghana train each year?

The question becomes more important when the number of people entering teacher education is considered alongside the number eventually absorbed into public teaching.

The National Service Authority’s 2026 figures alone show the scale involved. More than 14,000 trained teachers were issued national service PIN codes from 36 Colleges that had submitted their class lists.

At the same time, Ghana continues to experience teacher shortages in some communities and subjects.

That creates an apparent contradiction.

Ghana can have teacher shortages in schools while simultaneously having unemployed trained teachers outside the public payroll.

The problem, therefore, may not simply be the number of teachers Ghana produces. It may be the way teacher supply is planned, distributed and connected to actual vacancies.

This is where the debate about admission caps becomes important.

Should Ghana cap admission to Colleges of Education?

My answer is: Ghana should introduce a national teacher-workforce planning system that regulates admission numbers where necessary, but a crude uniform cap for every College would be the wrong solution.

The country needs a demand-based admission model.

Key Takeaways

Ghana currently has 49 public Colleges of Education, not 46.
The country needs more effective coordination between teacher-training admissions and teacher workforce demand.
More than 14,000 trained teachers were issued national service PIN codes in 2026 from the Colleges that submitted their lists.
Ghana simultaneously experiences teacher shortages in some regions and schools, showing that the problem is partly one of distribution and workforce planning.
Public recruitment is constrained by government finances and the availability of financial clearance.
A blanket admission cap could damage access to tertiary education, particularly for students from rural and disadvantaged communities.
Ghana should consider a demand-linked admission model rather than allowing admission numbers to expand without reference to projected teacher requirements.
Colleges should be differentiated according to institutional capacity, programme strengths, infrastructure and national teacher demand.
Teacher education planning should be linked to GES vacancy projections, retirement, attrition, pupil enrolment, regional shortages and subject-specific requirements.
The ultimate objective should be fewer unemployed qualified teachers, better-trained teachers and fewer classrooms without teachers.

The Real Problem: Ghana Can Have Teacher Shortages and Teacher Unemployment at the Same Time

The first mistake in this debate would be to assume that teacher unemployment automatically means Ghana does not need teachers.

That conclusion would be too simple.

The Volta Region, for example, recently became a practical illustration of the problem. The Regional Minister, James Gunu, directed GES to explore collaboration with the National Service Scheme and retired teachers to help address vacant classrooms while government pursued the recruitment of new teachers.

This tells us something important.

The country may have trained teachers waiting for employment while schools in particular locations still struggle to fill classrooms.

The problem is therefore partly allocation.

A teacher trained in one subject may not be needed in the district where he or she lives. A school may require Mathematics teachers while the available unemployed teachers are concentrated in another subject. A district may have excess teachers in one level while another level has vacancies.

Geographical distribution also matters.

The appropriate policy response must therefore distinguish between:

teacher production, teacher availability, teacher recruitment and teacher deployment.

They are related, but they are not the same thing.

The Case for Regulating College of Education Admissions

1. Training Capacity Must Mean Something

A College of Education cannot expand admissions indefinitely simply because applicants are available.

Teacher education requires classrooms, laboratories, libraries, ICT facilities, lecturers, teaching practice placements, accommodation and opportunities for supervised professional learning.

The Bachelor of Education programme is also substantially different from the old teacher-training model.

Students are being prepared for professional practice through academic study, pedagogical preparation and Supported Teaching in Schools.

If student numbers grow faster than institutional capacity, the quality of professional preparation can suffer.

This is particularly important for teacher education because the product of the system eventually enters classrooms occupied by children.

The country should therefore ask every College a simple question:

How many teacher trainees can this institution prepare well?

The answer should not be determined by demand for admission alone.

It should be based on institutional capacity.

2. Admission Should Be Linked to Teacher Demand

A more important question than “How many applicants do we have?” is:

How many teachers will Ghana need five years from now?

That calculation should include:

projected pupil enrolment
teacher-pupil ratios
retirement
attrition
expansion of schools
new programmes
regional teacher shortages
subject-specific shortages
urban-rural distribution
government policy changes
private-school employment
special education needs

For example, if demographic projections indicate that Ghana will require significantly more early-grade teachers, admission into Early Grade Education should respond accordingly.

If Mathematics and Science teacher shortages are projected, institutions should receive incentives to train more teachers in those areas.

If a particular specialisation has persistent graduate unemployment, admission should be reviewed.

This would turn teacher education from a largely supply-driven system into a workforce-planning system.

3. The Public Payroll Cannot Be the Only Planning Variable

There is another important caution.

It would be dangerous to determine teacher-training admissions solely according to the number of teachers GES can employ immediately.

The Ghanaian education system contains public schools, private schools, international schools, NGOs, special schools, tertiary institutions and other educational organisations.

Teachers also move into administration, educational consultancy, curriculum development, assessment, publishing and other professions.

Therefore, the formula should not be:

GES vacancies = College admissions.

Instead, it should be:

National teacher demand + projected attrition + education-sector alternatives + strategic reserve = teacher-training requirement.

A modest reserve may be necessary because workforce projections are never perfectly accurate.

4. Quality Must Accompany Expansion

Ghana’s teacher education system has undergone significant changes.

The transition to the four-year Bachelor of Education has raised expectations concerning academic preparation, pedagogy and professional practice.

The admission system must therefore consider whether Colleges have enough lecturers and facilities to support the number of students admitted.

The question is not simply whether a lecture hall can physically contain 400 students.

The question is whether those students can receive adequate supervision, feedback, assessment and professional mentoring.

This becomes especially important during school-based professional experiences.

A teacher trainee should not become merely a registration number.

The trainee requires meaningful interaction with lecturers, mentors and school-based supervisors.

This is one reason Ghana’s teacher education planning should pay greater attention to student-teacher ratios, lecturer workloads and practicum capacity.

5. The Teacher Employment Crisis Cannot Be Ignored

The employment question is perhaps the strongest argument for reform.

In 2025, government officials reported a large backlog of unemployed education professionals and acknowledged the fiscal pressure associated with absorbing them into the public sector.

In 2026, GNAT also raised concern about the number of qualified teachers without jobs and called for increased recruitment.

These developments should trigger a national policy conversation.

A young person who spends four years obtaining a professional degree should not graduate into years of uncertainty simply because the institutions responsible for training and employing teachers operate with weak coordination.

The state owes prospective students honest information.

If Ghana knows that employment opportunities in a particular teacher specialisation are limited, applicants should know this before choosing the programme.

That is part of responsible career guidance.

The Case Against a Blanket Admission Cap

A policy of admission control also carries risks.

1. Colleges of Education Are Access Institutions

For many students, especially those from rural communities, a College of Education may represent one of the most affordable routes into tertiary education.

Reducing admission without considering socioeconomic circumstances could close opportunities for students who have limited alternatives.

A national policy must therefore protect access.

The objective should not be to turn Colleges of Education into institutions accessible only to students with the highest grades.

2. Ghana Still Needs Teachers

It would be contradictory to reduce teacher preparation sharply while some schools continue to experience teacher shortages.

The recent situation in the Volta Region demonstrates the point.

If classrooms are empty because teachers are unavailable, the national response cannot simply be to produce fewer teachers.

The system must first determine where the shortages are, which subjects are affected and why teachers are not reaching those schools.

3. The Problem May Be Distribution Rather Than Production

Imagine Ghana has 10,000 qualified teachers seeking employment.

Suppose 3,000 are urgently needed in deprived districts, 2,000 are needed in particular subjects and another 1,000 are needed in growing urban communities.

If recruitment and deployment mechanisms fail to connect those teachers with those vacancies, simply reducing admission into Colleges will not solve the problem.

It will merely reduce future supply.

The country therefore needs better labour-market information.

4. A Uniform Cap Would Punish Different Colleges Equally

The 49 public Colleges of Education do not have identical infrastructure, staffing levels, geographical conditions, programme portfolios or student demand.

A College with excellent accommodation, adequate lecturers and strong practicum partnerships should not necessarily receive the same admission ceiling as an institution struggling with infrastructure.

The policy should therefore be differentiated.

The Ellis Model: A Demand-Based Teacher Education Admission Framework

Ghana needs a framework that links admission to national teacher workforce planning.

I propose what may be termed the Ellis Teacher Education Admission and Workforce Planning Model.

The model rests on six principles.

1. Demand

GES and the Ministry of Education should publish an annual five-year teacher demand projection.

The projection should identify national and regional requirements by:

level
subject
gender where necessary for strategic deployment
special education
geographical area

2. Capacity

Each College should undergo an annual capacity assessment.

The assessment should examine:

lecturer numbers
lecturer qualifications
classroom capacity
accommodation
ICT infrastructure
laboratories
libraries
teaching practice capacity
student support systems

Admission should reflect demonstrated capacity.

3. Merit

Academic performance should remain an important component of admission.

However, merit should operate within a broader national strategy.

Ghana should avoid a situation where admission is driven entirely by political pressure or institutional competition for student numbers.

4. Equity

A demand-based system must protect disadvantaged communities.

Special consideration may be necessary for applicants from deprived districts and communities where teacher recruitment remains difficult.

This should be transparent and based on published criteria.

5. Specialisation

Ghana should encourage Colleges to develop areas of comparative strength.

Some institutions could develop stronger programmes in:

Early Grade Education
STEM Education
Special and Inclusive Education
Languages
TVET Education
Agricultural Education
Digital Education
Rural and Community Education

Admission could then reflect national demand for these specialisations.

6. Employment Tracking

This is perhaps the most important component.

Government should establish a national database tracking graduates from Colleges of Education.

The database should show:

admission → graduation → national service → licensing → employment → deployment → retention.

Without this information, policymakers are planning teacher education with incomplete evidence.

Should Ghana Cap Admission at 350 Students Per College?

The idea of a uniform ceiling of 350 students per College is attractive because it is simple.

But I would not recommend making 350 a permanent national figure without institution-specific evidence.

A College’s appropriate intake should depend on its capacity and the national demand for its programmes.

A better formula would be:

Approved Admission = Demonstrated Institutional Capacity × National Programme Demand × Quality Threshold

This allows a College with strong capacity in a high-demand specialisation to admit more students than a College with limited capacity in an oversupplied field.

The number should therefore be calculated rather than politically negotiated.

What GTEC, PRINCOF, MoE and GES Should Do

The debate cannot be left to Colleges alone.

Ministry of Education

The Ministry should establish a national teacher workforce planning committee involving:

MoE
GES
GTEC
NTC
PRINCOF
National Service Authority
Ministry of Finance
teacher unions
Colleges of Education
universities
private-school representatives

The committee should publish annual teacher demand projections.

GTEC

GTEC should ensure that institutional capacity is considered when approving programmes and enrolment.

Accreditation should not end with programme approval.

Actual student numbers should also be monitored against institutional capacity.

GES

GES holds some of the most important workforce information.

It should provide reliable projections of:

vacancies
retirements
attrition
subject shortages
regional shortages
projected enrolment

NTC

NTC should contribute professional standards and licensing data.

Licensing information can help policymakers understand how many graduates successfully progress through the professional pipeline.

PRINCOF

PRINCOF should ensure that Colleges participate in national workforce planning rather than competing primarily for higher enrolment.

The Government Must Also Address Teacher Deployment

Admission reform alone will not solve Ghana’s teacher problem.

The government must make difficult schools and deprived communities more attractive.

That may require:

rural posting incentives
accommodation support
hardship allowances
accelerated promotion opportunities
professional development
improved school infrastructure
stronger teacher mentoring

A qualified teacher who refuses a deprived posting because the conditions are unbearable is part of a workforce policy problem.

The answer cannot always be to train another teacher.

Ghana Should Stop Treating Teacher Education and Teacher Employment as Separate Policies

This may be the central lesson.

At present, a young Ghanaian can:

Complete WASSCE.
Enter a College of Education.
Spend four years obtaining a B.Ed.
Complete national service.
Meet professional licensing requirements.
Wait for public recruitment.

At each stage, different institutions may control different parts of the process.

What is missing is a sufficiently integrated national workforce strategy.

Teacher education should therefore be viewed as a pipeline.

Admission is the beginning of the pipeline.

Employment is one of its principal destinations.

If the destination is congested, policymakers must examine the entire pipeline.

A New Question for Ghanaian Policymakers

The debate should not be reduced to:

“Should we admit more students?”

Nor should it be reduced to:

“Should we cap admissions?”

The better question is:

How many teachers does Ghana need, in which subjects, in which regions, at what time, and what number can the country’s teacher education institutions prepare to the required professional standard?

That is the question that should guide admission.

It moves the discussion from political pressure to workforce evidence.

My Position

I support regulated admissions, but I do not support a crude national cap imposed equally on every College of Education.

Ghana should adopt a demand-based, capacity-sensitive and equity-conscious admission system.

The government should determine annual teacher-training requirements using reliable workforce data.

Colleges should receive admission ceilings based on their capacity and programme strengths.

Students should continue to have broad access to teacher education, but they should also receive transparent information about employment prospects.

The state should publish teacher demand projections.

Teacher unions should participate in the planning process.

GES should strengthen deployment and recruitment.

GTEC should enforce institutional quality standards.

NTC should contribute licensing and professional data.

PRINCOF should help coordinate the Colleges.

This would create a system in which Ghana trains teachers because the country needs them, rather than simply because applicants are available.

The Bigger Issue Is the Future of the Teaching Profession

There is also a deeper issue here.

If young people repeatedly see professionally trained teachers spending years without employment, the teaching profession may gradually lose some of its strongest potential entrants.

That would be damaging.

Ghana needs talented young people to see teaching as a serious profession.

Teacher education must therefore offer a credible pathway from admission to professional practice.

The answer is not simply to reduce the number of students.

It is to create a system in which training, licensing, employment and professional development are planned together.

A teacher should know why he or she is being trained.

A College should know why it is admitting a particular number of students.

GES should know how many teachers it expects to need.

Government should know the financial implications.

And Ghanaian taxpayers should know that public investment in teacher education is being used responsibly.

Conclusion: Ghana Must Decide What Kind of Teacher Education System It Wants

The debate over College of Education admission is no longer a narrow question about how many students a College should admit.

It is a question about national planning.

Ghana has invested heavily in expanding access to teacher education. The transition to degree-level preparation has strengthened the professional aspirations of the sector.

The next stage must be smarter planning.

The country cannot afford a system in which teacher education expands without reference to institutional capacity, workforce demand and employment prospects.

At the same time, Ghana cannot afford to reduce teacher production blindly while classrooms remain without teachers.

The solution lies between these two extremes.

Train enough teachers. Train them well. Train them for identifiable national needs. Deploy them where they are needed. And give them a realistic pathway into professional employment.

That should be the future of teacher education policy in Ghana.

The question for policymakers is therefore no longer simply whether Colleges of Education should admit more students.

It is:

What number of teachers does Ghana actually need, and what system will ensure that every teacher we train has a meaningful professional pathway?

That is a conversation Ghana should have before the next admission cycle.

Author’s Note

This analysis is written by Ferdinand Ellis, an education researcher, lecturer, curriculum specialist and education policy analyst. His academic work has included research into the implementation of Supported Teaching in Schools and professional practice learning within Ghana’s teacher education system.

The purpose of this editorial is to stimulate evidence-based discussion among policymakers, teacher educators, teacher unions, prospective teachers and the wider public.

The proposed Ellis Teacher Education Admission and Workforce Planning Model is presented as a policy proposal for discussion. It is not an existing government policy.

References

Ghana Education Service. (2024). Teacher recruitment and self-posting of newly trained teachers. Ghana Education Service.

Ghana National Association of Teachers. (2026, May 1). GNAT demands expansion of teacher recruitment. Ghana News Agency.

Ghana News Agency. (2024, July 5). GES recruitment: More than 12,000 due for self-posting.

Ghana News Agency. (2025, October 17). GES secures clearance to pay 6,249 teachers.

National Service Authority. (2026, March 9). NSA issues PIN codes for over 14,000 trained teachers. MyJoyOnline.

Principals of Colleges of Education. (2025). Admission into the forty-six public Colleges of Education for the 2025/2026 academic year.

Ferdinand Ellis. (2026). Colleges of Education in Ghana: Complete guide. EducateGhana.com.

Ferdinand Ellis. (2026). Teacher recruitment in Ghana explained: GES hiring process, requirements, challenges and policy issues. EducateGhana.com.

UCC Crowned TBSC Version 8.0 Champions as UG and KNUST Finish Second and Third

Ferdinand Ellis

August 29, 2026

The University of Cape Coast has won TBSC Version 8.0 with 39.5 points, ahead of University of Ghana and KNUST in the Grand Finale.

By: Ferdinand Ellis
Publisher: EducateGhana.com

Article Information

Item	Details
Article Type	Competition / Higher Education News
Competition	Tertiary Business Sense Challenge
Edition	Version 8.0
Champion	University of Cape Coast
Champion’s Score	39.5 points
Second Place	University of Ghana, Legon
Second Place Score	29 points
Third Place	Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology
Third Place Score	24.5 points
Number of Universities	16
Organisers	Graphic Business and ICAG
Publisher	EducateGhana.com

Fact Check & Editorial Review

The University of Cape Coast (UCC) emerged as champion of the Tertiary Business Sense Challenge (TBSC) Version 8.0 Grand Finale.

UCC finished the final with 39.5 points, followed by the University of Ghana (UG) with 29 points and Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (KNUST) with 24.5 points.

The competition brought together university teams to test their knowledge in areas including business, accounting, finance and economics.

The reported result places UCC at the top of the Version 8.0 final standings.

Key Takeaways

UCC won TBSC Version 8.0 with 39.5 points.
University of Ghana finished second with 29 points.
KNUST, the defending champion, placed third with 24.5 points.
UCC dominated the Business Case round, scoring 18.5 points.
The competition featured 16 universities across four zones.
The victory gives UCC its third TBSC national title, following previous victories in 2019 and 2021.

UCC Wins TBSC Version 8.0

The University of Cape Coast has been crowned champion of the Tertiary Business Sense Challenge Version 8.0 after an impressive performance in the Grand Finale.

UCC accumulated 39.5 points to finish at the top of the three-team final.

The victory represents another significant achievement for UCC’s business students, who demonstrated strong knowledge across the competition’s different areas.

The university’s performance was particularly strong in Round 3, the Business Case segment, where the team recorded 18.5 points.

Final Standings

The Grand Finale produced the following final positions:

Position	University	Points
🏆 1st	University of Cape Coast (UCC)	39.5
2nd	University of Ghana, Legon	29
3rd	KNUST	24.5

UCC therefore finished 10.5 points ahead of UG, while UG placed 4.5 points ahead of KNUST.

UCC’s Route to the Grand Finale

UCC’s championship campaign included strong performances in the earlier stages of the competition.

The university defeated Academic City by 61 points to 21 and later overcame Ghana Communication Technology University (GCTU) by 45 points to 15.5.

These performances helped UCC progress through the competition and ultimately secure a place in the three-way Grand Finale.

The team’s consistency across the various rounds proved decisive when the championship was eventually settled.

UCC Claims Third TBSC Title

The Version 8.0 victory gives UCC its third Tertiary Business Sense Challenge title.

The university previously won the competition in 2019 and 2021.

The latest triumph therefore strengthens UCC’s record in a competition that has become an important platform for testing business and financial knowledge among university students.

The achievement also provides another point of recognition for UCC’s School of Business and its students.

UG Finishes Second

The University of Ghana, Legon secured second place after recording 29 points in the Grand Finale.

Although UG could not overtake UCC for the championship, its performance placed the university ahead of KNUST.

The result confirms UG’s competitive presence in a national university-level competition that brings together students from different institutions.

KNUST Finishes Third

KNUST finished third with 24.5 points.

The result came as the university entered the competition as the defending champion.

KNUST’s third-place finish means that the previous champions were unable to retain the title in Version 8.0.

UCC’s victory consequently brought the championship back to the University of Cape Coast.

What Is the Tertiary Business Sense Challenge?

The Tertiary Business Sense Challenge is a university-level competition focused on areas of knowledge relevant to business and finance.

The competition tests participants in disciplines including business, accounting, finance and economics.

Version 8.0 involved 16 universities divided across four zones, creating a broad national platform for tertiary students to demonstrate their academic and analytical abilities.

The competition was organised by Graphic Business and the Institute of Chartered Accountants, Ghana (ICAG).

Why the Victory Matters

Competitions such as TBSC provide university students with opportunities to apply classroom knowledge in competitive settings.

The questions and case-based activities require participants to draw on knowledge of business and finance while demonstrating speed, accuracy, analysis and teamwork.

For UCC, the latest victory also adds to the university’s record in the competition and demonstrates the strength of its students in business-related academic contests.

For UG and KNUST, the results provide a basis for renewed preparation ahead of subsequent editions.

The Bigger Picture for University Students

Academic competitions can complement conventional university education by exposing students to practical problems and competitive decision-making.

Business case competitions are particularly useful because they can require students to interpret information, identify problems, evaluate alternatives and defend their conclusions.

The TBSC therefore provides a platform through which participating universities can showcase students who have developed knowledge in business, accounting, finance and economics.

Conclusion

The University of Cape Coast has won Tertiary Business Sense Challenge Version 8.0, recording 39.5 points in the Grand Finale.

The University of Ghana finished second with 29 points, while KNUST, the defending champion, placed third with 24.5 points.

UCC’s latest victory marks its third TBSC title, following its previous championships in 2019 and 2021.

The achievement adds another national competition success to UCC’s record and highlights the continuing role of university-level academic competitions in developing business and analytical skills among Ghanaian students.

Congratulations to Team UCC on winning TBSC Version 8.0.

GES Recruitment 2026: Two Arrested Over Alleged Money Demands From Applicants

Ferdinand Ellis

August 29, 2026

Two suspects have been arrested and arraigned over alleged demands for money from applicants in connection with the ongoing GES recruitment exercise. GES says recruitment is free.

By: Ferdinand Ellis
Publisher: EducateGhana.com

Article Information

Item	Details
Article Type	Education News / Recruitment Alert
Institution	Ghana Education Service
Issue	Alleged recruitment-related fraud
Suspects Identified	Four
Arrested	Two
Arraigned	Accra Circuit Court 6
Others	Two suspects reportedly at large
Recruitment Status	Ongoing
Application Cost	Recruitment is stated by GES to be free
Primary Audience	GES recruitment applicants, teachers and the general public
Publisher	EducateGhana.com
Author	Ferdinand Ellis

Fact Check & Editorial Review

The Ghana Education Service has confirmed that two individuals have been arrested in connection with alleged demands for money from applicants participating in the ongoing GES recruitment exercise.

According to Management, four suspects were identified in connection with the alleged activities. Two have been arrested and arraigned before the Accra Circuit Court 6, while the other two are reportedly at large.

The allegations concern attempts to obtain money from applicants by exploiting the GES recruitment process.

GES has stressed that recruitment into the Service is free and is conducted through established procedures.

The suspects have been arraigned to face due process. Their arrest and prosecution should therefore not be interpreted as a determination of guilt.

GES has also rejected suggestions that the arrests constitute a scandal involving the Service or the recruitment exercise. Management says the action demonstrates its efforts to protect the recruitment process from fraud and abuse.

Key Takeaways

Two individuals have been arrested over alleged demands for money from GES recruitment applicants.
Four suspects were reportedly identified.
Two suspects have been arraigned before Accra Circuit Court 6.
Two other suspects are reportedly at large.
GES says its recruitment exercise is free.
Applicants should not pay anyone who claims to have influence over recruitment, appointment letters or placement.
Anyone who encounters suspected recruitment fraud should report it to the appropriate authorities.
The allegations against the suspects remain subject to due legal process.

Introduction

The Ghana Education Service has intensified efforts to protect its ongoing recruitment exercise following the arrest of two individuals allegedly involved in demanding money from applicants.

The development comes as prospective teachers and other applicants continue to follow the recruitment process in search of employment opportunities within the Service.

GES Management says the arrests form part of its monitoring of the recruitment exercise and efforts to prevent individuals from exploiting applicants.

The Service has consequently renewed its warning to the public that GES recruitment is free and that applicants should be cautious of anyone demanding money in exchange for recruitment-related assistance.

Two Suspects Arrested and Arraigned

According to GES Management, four individuals were identified in connection with alleged attempts to demand money from recruitment applicants.

Two of the suspects were arrested through collaboration between GES Management and the security agencies.

The two arrested suspects have subsequently been arraigned before Accra Circuit Court 6, where they are expected to face the legal process relating to the allegations.

GES said the remaining two suspects are currently at large.

The specific outcome of the court proceedings will determine the legal status of the accused persons. Until the court determines the matter, the allegations should be treated as allegations rather than established facts.

GES Recruitment Remains Free

One of the most important messages from Management is that recruitment into the Ghana Education Service does not require applicants to pay money to secure employment.

Applicants should therefore be extremely cautious when approached by individuals claiming to have connections within GES or the ability to influence the recruitment process.

In particular, applicants should be suspicious of requests for money in exchange for:

Recruitment opportunities
Appointment letters
Posting or placement
Assistance with selection
Alleged “protocol” arrangements
Guaranteed employment

A person who demands money while claiming to be able to secure a GES appointment should not automatically be trusted.

GES Rejects Claims of a Recruitment Scandal

GES Management has also sought to distinguish the arrests from claims that a scandal has engulfed the Service.

Management’s position is that the identification and arrest of individuals allegedly attempting to exploit applicants demonstrates active monitoring of the recruitment exercise.

The Service says it is taking action to protect the credibility of the process and prevent fraudsters from using the GES name to obtain money from unsuspecting applicants.

This distinction is important because allegations involving individuals connected to a recruitment process do not, by themselves, establish wrongdoing by the institution conducting the recruitment.

The criminal allegations against the arrested persons must be determined through the judicial process.

Warning to GES Recruitment Applicants

Applicants should exercise particular caution during recruitment periods because employment opportunities can attract individuals who falsely claim to have access to recruitment officials.

An applicant should never assume that paying money guarantees employment.

Applicants should also be careful when sharing personal documents, passwords, Ghana Card details, bank information or other sensitive information with unknown persons.

Where an applicant receives an unsolicited request for money or encounters someone claiming to have special access to the recruitment process, the matter should be reported.

How Applicants Can Protect Themselves

GES recruitment applicants can take several practical steps to protect themselves.

1. Do Not Pay for Recruitment

GES has stated that its recruitment exercise is free. Applicants should therefore be cautious about any request for payment.

2. Verify Information

Applicants should rely on official GES communication and established recruitment channels for information.

3. Be Careful With Appointment Claims

Anyone promising an appointment letter or placement in exchange for money should be treated with caution.

4. Keep Evidence

Applicants who receive suspicious messages, payment requests or recruitment promises should preserve relevant evidence, including messages, telephone numbers and payment details where applicable.

5. Report Suspicious Activity

Suspected recruitment fraud should be reported promptly to the appropriate authorities so that investigations can be conducted.

Why the Arrests Matter

Recruitment exercises involve large numbers of applicants competing for limited opportunities.

This can create an environment in which dishonest individuals attempt to exploit applicants who are anxious about securing employment.

The GES warning therefore has significance beyond the four individuals identified in the current case.

It serves as a reminder that applicants should distinguish between legitimate recruitment procedures and private individuals claiming to possess influence over the process.

The involvement of security agencies also demonstrates the potential criminal consequences of attempts to defraud applicants using the name of a public institution.

What Applicants Should Remember

The central message from GES is simple:

Do not pay anyone to secure GES recruitment, an appointment letter or placement.

Applicants who follow the official recruitment process should not allow individuals to pressure them into making payments based on promises of guaranteed employment.

Where suspicious activities are identified, reporting them can assist the authorities in protecting other applicants.

Conclusion

The Ghana Education Service says two individuals have been arrested and arraigned in connection with alleged demands for money from applicants in the ongoing recruitment exercise.

Four suspects were reportedly identified, with two arrested and two others still at large.

GES has maintained that recruitment into the Service is free and has urged applicants to remain vigilant against individuals attempting to exploit the recruitment process.

The Service has also assured the public that it will continue working with the security agencies to identify and take action against persons suspected of defrauding applicants or using the name of GES improperly.

For applicants, the most important lesson is to follow official recruitment procedures, avoid unauthorised payments and report suspected fraud promptly.

EducateGhana.com will continue to monitor the GES recruitment exercise and provide verified updates on recruitment, appointment letters, postings and related developments.

Frequently Asked Questions

Is GES recruitment free?

Yes. GES Management has stated that recruitment into the Ghana Education Service is free.

Have people been arrested over the GES recruitment exercise?

Yes. GES says two individuals have been arrested in connection with alleged demands for money from applicants.

How many suspects were identified?

GES reported that four suspects were identified. Two have been arrested and two are reportedly at large.

Where were the arrested suspects arraigned?

The two arrested suspects were arraigned before Accra Circuit Court 6.

Can someone pay money to secure GES placement?

Applicants should not pay anyone who claims that money is required to secure GES recruitment, an appointment letter or placement.

Are the arrested suspects guilty?

No determination of guilt should be made solely from the arrests or allegations. The suspects are subject to due legal process and the court will determine the matter.

Editorial Note

This report is based on information attributed to the Ghana Education Service. EducateGhana.com does not independently determine the guilt or innocence of the persons arrested. Any further reporting on the case should reflect developments from the relevant authorities and the court.

GES Extends 2026 Teacher Promotion Application Deadline to September 4

Ferdinand Ellis

August 29, 2026

GES has extended the deadline for applications for the 2026 Teacher Promotion to Friday, September 4, 2026, to allow teachers facing technical challenges to complete their applications.

By: Ferdinand Ellis
Publisher: EducateGhana.com

Article Information

Item	Details
Article Type	GES Update / Teacher Promotion
Institution	Ghana Education Service
Subject	2026 Teacher Promotion Applications
New Deadline	Friday, 4 September 2026
Reason for Extension	To assist applicants experiencing technical challenges
Support Channel	GES IT Team
Application Platform	GES Promotions Portal
Target Audience	Teachers applying for the 2026 promotion
Publisher	EducateGhana.com
Author	Ferdinand Ellis

Fact Check & Editorial Review

The Ghana Education Service has extended the deadline for applications for the 2026 Teacher Promotion to Friday, 4 September 2026.

The extension is intended to give teachers who have encountered technical difficulties during the application process additional time to resolve the problems and complete their applications.

Teachers experiencing technical challenges have been directed to submit their details to the GES IT Team through the designated promotion platform.

Applicants are advised to take advantage of the extension rather than wait until the final day.

Key Takeaways

The 2026 GES Teacher Promotion application deadline has been extended.
The new deadline is Friday, 4 September 2026.
The extension is intended to assist applicants experiencing technical challenges.
Teachers facing problems should submit their details to the GES IT Team.
Applicants should complete their applications as early as possible before the extended deadline.

Introduction

Teachers who are yet to complete their applications for the 2026 GES Teacher Promotion have been given additional time following an extension of the application deadline.

The Ghana Education Service has moved the deadline to Friday, 4 September 2026, citing technical challenges experienced by some applicants.

The extension provides affected teachers with an opportunity to resolve application-related difficulties and complete the process.

New Deadline for GES Teacher Promotion Applications

The revised deadline for the 2026 Teacher Promotion application is:

Friday, 4 September 2026

Teachers who have not yet submitted their applications should therefore ensure that all required stages are completed before the new deadline.

Applicants who have already successfully completed their applications do not need to restart the process solely because the deadline has been extended.

Why Has GES Extended the Deadline?

The extension has been announced to provide additional time for applicants who have encountered technical difficulties.

Online application systems can sometimes present challenges involving access, registration, document submission, verification or other stages of the application process.

GES has therefore provided the extension to enable affected teachers to have such challenges addressed.

The extension should be viewed as an opportunity for applicants with genuine technical difficulties to resolve their problems and complete the process.

What Should Teachers Facing Technical Problems Do?

Teachers experiencing technical challenges have been directed to submit their details to the GES IT Team through the designated platform.

GES Promotions Portal:
GES Promotions Portal

Applicants should provide accurate information when reporting their difficulties so that the IT Team can properly identify and address the problem.

Teachers should also avoid submitting incomplete or inaccurate information, particularly where the issue involves their personal or professional records.

Teachers Should Not Wait Until the Final Day

Although the deadline has been extended, applicants are encouraged to complete their applications as early as possible.

Waiting until 4 September could create additional pressure, particularly if an applicant encounters a technical problem close to the deadline.

Teachers who are experiencing difficulties should report them promptly through the designated channel.

Those who have not yet begun the process should also avoid unnecessary delays.

What the Extension Means for Applicants

The extension does not necessarily mean that the entire promotion exercise has been postponed.

It specifically provides additional time for the application process.

Teachers should therefore distinguish between the application deadline and subsequent stages of the promotion exercise, including verification, aptitude testing or other processes that may be communicated separately by the Ghana Education Service.

Applicants should rely on official GES communication for information concerning subsequent stages.

Practical Checklist for Applicants

Before the new deadline, teachers should ensure that they have:

Accessed the official promotion application platform.
Completed the required application information.
Checked their personal and professional details carefully.
Uploaded any required documents.
Reviewed the application before submission.
Completed the final submission process where required.
Kept evidence or confirmation of a successful application.
Reported unresolved technical difficulties to the GES IT Team promptly.

Important Reminder to Teachers

Teachers should be cautious about individuals who request money in exchange for resolving technical problems or guaranteeing success in the promotion exercise.

A technical problem should be reported through the appropriate official channel.

Applicants should also keep their login details and other personal information secure.

Conclusion

The Ghana Education Service has extended the deadline for applications for the 2026 Teacher Promotion to Friday, 4 September 2026.

The extension is intended to provide additional time for teachers experiencing technical challenges to have their problems addressed.

Teachers who are yet to complete their applications should use the additional period wisely, while applicants facing technical difficulties should submit their details to the GES IT Team through the designated promotion platform.

New deadline: Friday, 4 September 2026.

Teachers are encouraged to complete their applications early and avoid waiting until the final hours of the extended deadline.

EducateGhana.com will continue to provide verified updates on the GES Teacher Promotion 2026 exercise.

GTEC and College of Education Certificates: What DBE Holders Should Know About University Top-Up in Ghana

Ferdinand Ellis

August 29, 2026

Are College of Education DBE holders eligible for university top-up or postgraduate admission in 2026? EducateGhana explains qualification pathways, B.Ed, GTEC accreditation and what applicants should verify.

By: Ferdinand Ellis
Publisher: EducateGhana.com
Category: Study in Ghana → Colleges of Education / Higher Education

Article Information

Item	Details
Article Type	Education Policy Explainer
Topic	GTEC, College of Education certificates and university progression
Academic Year	2026/2027
Primary Audience	Teachers, College of Education graduates and prospective university applicants
Key Qualification Discussed	Diploma in Basic Education (DBE)
Related Qualification	Bachelor of Education (B.Ed)
Regulatory Body	Ghana Tertiary Education Commission (GTEC)
Publisher	EducateGhana.com
Author	Ferdinand Ellis
Status	Explainer and guidance article

Fact Check & Editorial Review

There is growing discussion among College of Education graduates about whether holders of the former Diploma in Basic Education (DBE) can still use their certificates to pursue further university education.

The issue requires careful treatment because a DBE certificate, a B.Ed degree and admission to a particular postgraduate or undergraduate programme are three different matters.

A DBE is not the same academic qualification as a bachelor’s degree. Consequently, a university cannot simply treat every DBE holder as a bachelor’s degree holder for admission into a master’s programme.

At the same time, this should not be interpreted to mean that the DBE has become an invalid certificate or that every DBE holder has automatically lost the opportunity to progress academically.

Admission requirements depend on the programme, institution, applicable accreditation requirements and the applicant’s academic background.

EducateGhana therefore advises applicants to verify the specific programme and admission pathway with the university and GTEC before paying fees.

Claims that GTEC has generally declared all DBE certificates “useless” or that every DBE holder is automatically barred from further university education should not be circulated without documentary evidence.

Key Takeaways

The Diploma in Basic Education (DBE) is a diploma qualification and should not automatically be treated as equivalent to a bachelor’s degree.
A B.Ed is a bachelor’s degree and provides a different academic progression pathway.
Holding a DBE does not mean that a graduate has no opportunity for further education.
Applicants must distinguish between DBE-to-B.Ed progression and admission to postgraduate programmes.
Universities must operate programmes within the applicable accreditation and admission requirements.
Applicants should verify the accreditation status of a programme before paying application or tuition fees.
A claim that a particular programme is “GTEC approved” should be supported by current accreditation information.
Prospective applicants should obtain written clarification from the relevant university when their qualification is not clearly covered by published admission requirements.

Introduction

Ghana’s teacher education system has undergone major changes over the past decade.

One of the most significant changes has been the movement from the traditional diploma-based teacher education system towards a degree-based teacher education model.

This transition has created questions among teachers who obtained the former Diploma in Basic Education, particularly those seeking to upgrade their qualifications through university programmes.

Some teachers have reported difficulties when attempting to progress academically, while others have encountered different admission requirements from different institutions.

The resulting discussion has sometimes produced the impression that the DBE certificate itself has been rejected by Ghana’s tertiary education system.

That conclusion is too broad.

The important question is not simply whether a teacher holds a DBE. The important questions are what programme the teacher is applying for, what qualification the university requires, whether the applicant meets those requirements, and whether the programme is properly accredited.

What is the Diploma in Basic Education?
What changed in Ghana’s teacher education system?
DBE versus B.Ed
Can a DBE holder continue to university?
Why postgraduate admission is different
The role of GTEC
What teachers should check before applying
The importance of programme accreditation
Common misconceptions about DBE certificates
Possible academic pathways for DBE holders
Advice for teachers seeking promotion and career advancement
Frequently Asked Questions
Conclusion

1. What Is the Diploma in Basic Education?

The Diploma in Basic Education (DBE) was the traditional professional qualification produced through Ghana’s Colleges of Education system before the implementation of the four-year Bachelor of Education teacher education programme.

For many years, the DBE provided the academic and professional preparation through which teachers entered Ghana’s basic education system.

Thousands of teachers who currently serve in Ghana’s schools hold DBE certificates.

The fact that the teacher education system has changed does not retrospectively erase those qualifications.

A qualification obtained legitimately under the rules applicable at the time remains part of the academic record of the person who obtained it.

The issue arises when the holder seeks admission to a new programme whose entry requirements are based on a bachelor’s degree or another specified qualification.

2. What Changed in Ghana’s Teacher Education System?

Ghana introduced a major reform of pre-service teacher education, leading to the adoption of the four-year Bachelor of Education programme in Colleges of Education.

The reform sought to strengthen teacher preparation and align teacher education with the professional expectations of the National Teachers’ Standards and the National Teacher Education Curriculum Framework.

Under the new model, students in Colleges of Education pursue a bachelor’s degree rather than the traditional diploma qualification.

This means that graduates from the two systems leave with different academic awards.

The transition has therefore created legitimate questions about how holders of older qualifications should progress academically.

➡️ Related EducateGhana Guide: Understanding the Bachelor of Education Programme in Ghana
➡️ Related EducateGhana Guide: Complete Guide to Ghana’s 46 Public Colleges of Education

3. DBE Versus B.Ed

The distinction is straightforward.

A Diploma in Basic Education is a diploma-level qualification.

A Bachelor of Education is a bachelor’s degree.

Although both qualifications may be associated with teacher preparation, they are not automatically interchangeable for every academic admission purpose.

This distinction becomes particularly important when an applicant wishes to enter a programme that requires a bachelor’s degree.

For example, a master’s degree normally requires applicants to possess an appropriate bachelor’s degree or another qualification expressly accepted under the institution’s admission rules.

A DBE holder should therefore not assume that a university will automatically regard the diploma as equivalent to a bachelor’s degree.

➡️ Related EducateGhana Guide: Diploma in Basic Education and B.Ed: Key Differences
➡️ Related EducateGhana Guide: Teacher Education Reform in Ghana Explained

4. Can a DBE Holder Continue to University?

Yes, further academic progression remains possible.

However, the pathway depends on the programme being sought and the admission requirements of the institution.

A DBE holder seeking another qualification should first identify whether the intended programme accepts the DBE directly.

Where a university requires a bachelor’s degree, the applicant may need to pursue an appropriate degree-level programme before progressing to postgraduate study.

The correct pathway must be determined from the institution’s current admission requirements rather than from social media claims or advice from unofficial agents.

Teachers should also distinguish between professional upgrading, academic progression, and qualification conversion.

These terms can refer to different programmes and should not be used interchangeably.

5. Why Postgraduate Admission Is Different

One of the major sources of confusion concerns master’s degree admission.

A person who has completed a DBE cannot simply assume that the diploma gives automatic access to an M.Ed, MPhil or another master’s programme.

A postgraduate programme operates at a higher academic level and therefore has its own entry requirements.

Universities may also prescribe particular bachelor’s degrees, class requirements, professional experience or other conditions.

The appropriate question is therefore:

Does the specific master’s programme accept the qualification I currently hold?

If the answer is no, the applicant should ask the university what recognised academic pathway would make the applicant eligible.

This is where teachers should exercise caution.

A person should not pay an application fee simply because an intermediary claims that “GTEC has approved” a particular route.

The programme and institution should be independently verified.

6. The Role of GTEC

The Ghana Tertiary Education Commission (GTEC) is responsible for important aspects of the regulation and quality assurance of tertiary education in Ghana.

Its regulatory responsibilities include matters relating to accreditation and quality assurance within Ghana’s tertiary education sector.

For applicants, this means that accreditation matters.

A university may offer a programme, but applicants should still establish whether the particular programme has the required regulatory approval.

This is especially important where an institution is advertising unusual conversion, top-up or accelerated programmes.

Teachers should ask for clear information about:

The name of the institution awarding the qualification.
The exact title of the programme.
The level of the qualification.
The duration of the programme.
The admission requirements.
The accreditation status of the programme.
The institution responsible for awarding the final certificate.

These checks can prevent applicants from spending money on programmes that do not provide the qualification they expect.

7. What Teachers Should Check Before Applying

Before submitting an application, a DBE holder should take several practical steps.

Step 1: Identify the target qualification

Decide whether the objective is another diploma, a bachelor’s degree, a postgraduate diploma, a master’s degree or another professional qualification.

Step 2: Check the university’s admission requirements

Read the current admission requirements published by the university.

Do not rely solely on a WhatsApp message, Facebook post or verbal assurance.

Step 3: Check whether the DBE is accepted

If the published requirements mention bachelor’s degree holders but do not mention DBE holders, contact the admissions office.

Step 4: Verify accreditation

Check the relevant programme’s regulatory status.

Step 5: Ask for written clarification

Where there is uncertainty, obtain clarification from the university’s admissions office or registrar.

A written response is much safer than relying on an unofficial agent.

Step 6: Keep your academic records

Applicants should retain their certificates, transcripts and other supporting academic documents.

These may be required during admission or qualification verification.

8. The Importance of Programme Accreditation

Programme accreditation is particularly important for teachers because an academic qualification may later be used for employment, professional development, promotion or admission to another programme.

An applicant should therefore avoid programmes advertised with phrases such as “fast-track B.Ed”, “six-month conversion”, or “guaranteed master’s admission” unless the programme’s status has been independently verified.

The shorter duration of a programme does not by itself establish whether the qualification is recognised.

Applicants should focus on the institution, programme, qualification level and accreditation status.

9. Common Misconceptions About DBE Certificates

Misconception 1: “DBE certificates are now useless.”

This is incorrect as a general statement.

A qualification does not become worthless simply because the education system has introduced a new qualification framework.

The relevant issue is whether the qualification satisfies the requirements of the particular opportunity being pursued.

Misconception 2: “Every DBE holder can enter a master’s programme.”

This is also incorrect.

Master’s admission depends on the entry requirements of the specific programme and institution.

Misconception 3: “Every DBE holder must repeat teacher education from the beginning.”

There is no basis for making such a blanket statement.

Individual academic pathways depend on the qualification already held and the requirements of the intended programme.

Misconception 4: “Any programme advertised as a top-up is automatically recognised.”

Applicants should never make this assumption.

The programme’s regulatory status should be verified before payment.

10. Possible Academic Pathways for DBE Holders

The appropriate pathway will depend on the individual’s circumstances.

A simplified pathway can be represented as follows:

DBE holder → Appropriate bachelor’s degree/top-up pathway → Bachelor’s degree → Postgraduate qualification

However, this is not a universal admission formula.

Some institutions may have specific programmes designed for holders of particular diplomas.

Others may require applicants to enter at a specified level or complete additional academic requirements.

The important principle is that the applicant should follow the recognised pathway prescribed by the institution and applicable regulatory requirements.

11. What This Means for Teachers Seeking Career Advancement

Academic upgrading has become increasingly important in Ghana’s education sector.

Teachers who intend to progress professionally should therefore approach qualification upgrading as a long-term career decision.

A teacher should consider not only the immediate qualification but also what that qualification permits in the future.

For example, a qualification may affect eligibility for:

Further university study
Professional development
Teaching appointments
Promotion requirements
Academic research
Leadership responsibilities
Other education-related career opportunities

Teachers should therefore avoid selecting programmes solely because they are inexpensive, short or convenient.

The central question should be whether the qualification is properly recognised and whether it supports the teacher’s intended career pathway.

12. Frequently Asked Questions

Is the Diploma in Basic Education still a valid qualification?

A legitimately awarded DBE remains an academic qualification obtained under the teacher education system applicable at the time. However, its acceptance for a new programme depends on the admission requirements of that programme.

Can a DBE holder apply for a bachelor’s degree?

Yes. The appropriate route depends on the university, programme and applicable admission requirements.

Can a DBE holder go directly to a master’s degree?

A DBE should not automatically be treated as a bachelor’s degree. Applicants must check the entry requirements of the specific master’s programme.

Does GTEC accredit individual applicants?

GTEC’s regulatory role includes tertiary education institutions and programmes. Applicants should therefore verify the status of the institution and programme rather than treating personal eligibility as an accreditation issue.

Should I pay for a top-up programme before checking accreditation?

No. Applicants should verify the institution, programme, qualification and accreditation status before making substantial payments.

Has Ghana abolished the DBE?

The teacher education system has moved towards the four-year B.Ed model. This does not mean that previously awarded DBE certificates have simply ceased to exist as qualifications.

13. Conclusion

The debate over College of Education certificates and university top-up opportunities requires careful attention to the distinction between qualification validity, academic equivalence, admission eligibility and programme accreditation.

The introduction of the four-year B.Ed has changed the structure of teacher education in Ghana. It has also created new questions for teachers who obtained qualifications under the earlier diploma system.

DBE holders should therefore avoid panic and misinformation.

The safest approach is to identify the qualification they currently hold, determine the qualification they want to obtain, examine the university’s current admission requirements and verify the regulatory status of the programme before paying fees.

For teachers planning long-term careers in education, academic upgrading should be approached as a strategic professional decision.

EducateGhana.com will continue to monitor developments concerning teacher education, GTEC accreditation, College of Education qualifications and university top-up programmes in Ghana.

Author

Ferdinand Ellis is an education researcher, curriculum specialist, lecturer, journalist and founder of EducateGhana.com. His work focuses on teacher education, curriculum, education policy, professional practice learning and education development in Ghana.

Editorial Note

This article should be updated whenever GTEC, the Ministry of Education, the Ghana Tertiary Education Commission, the Ghana Education Service or an individual university issues a new official directive affecting College of Education qualifications.

Readers should rely on current official admission and accreditation information before making academic or financial decisions.

BREAKING: GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG Demand Automatic Salary Adjustment for Newly Promoted Teachers by 31 August

Ferdinand Ellis

August 29, 2026

GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG are reported to be demanding automatic salary placement for newly promoted teachers.
The unions want the appropriate salary scales to reflect the new ranks by August 31, 2026.

By Ferdinand Ellis | EducateGhana.com
Published: August 27, 2026
Category: Education News
Focus Keyword: GES Promotion 2026 Salary Adjustment

Article Information

Item	Details
Category	News
Section	Teacher Education & GES
Topic	GES Promotion 2026
Article Type	Breaking News / Education Policy
Date	August 27, 2026
Institutions	GES, MoE, GNAT, NAGRAT, PRETAG
Issue	Automatic salary placement for newly promoted teachers
Deadline at issue	August 31, 2026
Author	Ferdinand Ellis
Status	Developing

Fact Check & Editorial Review

EducateGhana.com has independently verified the existence and substance of the GES Immediate Release dated August 22, 2026, referenced GES/HQ/PR/26/155. GES stated that teachers who have been promoted to new ranks are to be placed automatically on the appropriate salary scale and that the existing practice had not changed.

However, at the time of publication, EducateGhana.com has not independently located the full August 27 joint statement of GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG on an official union website or other primary source available online. The demands and positions attributed to the three unions in this article are therefore presented as information contained in the statement supplied for publication and should be read alongside the verified GES position.

This distinction is important because reports from teacher communication channels indicate that some districts were subsequently asking promoted teachers to submit documents or IPPD-related information, despite the August 22 GES public clarification.

Editorial assessment: The central dispute is now whether salary placement will proceed automatically through the GES and payroll systems or whether teachers will be required to complete additional documentation before they can be placed on the appropriate scale.

Key Takeaways

GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG are reported to be demanding automatic salary placement for newly promoted teachers.
The unions want the appropriate salary scales to reflect the new ranks by August 31, 2026.
GES previously stated on August 22 that automatic placement remains the established practice.
GES also directed teachers to disregard requests to submit documents specifically for salary adjustment.
Reports indicate that some districts have nevertheless requested documents from successful promotion candidates.
The unions are reportedly warning that any attempt to change the existing practice without consultation will be resisted.
The immediate concern for teachers is whether their new ranks and salaries will be reflected in the payroll within the stated period.

Introduction

The dispute over the salary placement of Ghana Education Service teachers who successfully obtained promotion in the 2025 promotion exercise has taken a new turn.

The Ghana National Association of Teachers (GNAT), National Association of Graduate Teachers (NAGRAT) and Pre-Tertiary Teachers Association of Ghana (PRETAG) are reported to have jointly demanded that newly promoted teachers be placed automatically on the appropriate grades and salary scales.

The demand comes amid confusion over conflicting instructions reaching some teachers after GES Headquarters had publicly stated that the established automatic placement arrangement had not changed.

The issue has become particularly important because GES had earlier indicated that qualified teachers would be placed on the appropriate scales by August 31, 2026.

Teacher Unions Demand Automatic Salary Placement

The three pre-tertiary teacher unions are reported to have called on the Ministry of Education and GES to honour the existing arrangement for teachers who have successfully obtained promotion.

The unions involved are GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG. The statement is attributed to Thomas T. Musah, General Secretary of GNAT, Jacob Anaba, President of NAGRAT, and King Ali Awudu, President of PRETAG.

Their position is that promotion to a higher rank should result in the corresponding salary placement without creating an additional process that could delay the implementation.

The unions reportedly maintain that this has been the established practice for promoted teachers in recent years.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

The demand follows growing concern among teachers who have already received promotion letters but remain uncertain about when their new ranks and corresponding salaries will appear in the payroll.

The unions reportedly want the process completed within the timeline previously communicated by GES.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

What GES Said About Automatic Salary Adjustment

GES Headquarters issued an Immediate Release on August 22, 2026, referenced GES/HQ/PR/26/155, signed by Daniel Fenyi, Head of Public Relations.

The Service said it had received complaints from some newly promoted teachers who were being asked to submit application letters, promotion letters and other documents to facilitate salary adjustment.

GES stated that such a requirement did not represent the established procedure.

According to the Service, teachers promoted to new ranks are normally placed automatically on the appropriate salary scale corresponding to their new positions. GES further stated that this practice had not changed.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

GES consequently directed teachers to disregard requests to submit documents specifically for salary adjustment.

The Service also said it was engaging regions and districts where such requests had reportedly been made and appealed to teachers to remain calm while the matter was addressed.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

Why Teachers Are Confused

The controversy has arisen because information reaching teachers at district level has not always appeared consistent with the August 22 GES Headquarters release.

Reports circulating among teachers indicate that some districts have asked successful promotion candidates to submit documents including application letters, promotion letters, payslips and other personnel information.

One teacher communication channel has also reported that some discussions involved the completion of IPPD forms as part of the payroll process.

:➡ Related: GES Promotion Letters and Salary Placement Guide⁠�
➡ Related: GES Promotion 2026: What Successful Teachers Should Know

This has created uncertainty because teachers are asking whether the documents are genuinely required for payroll processing or whether they are being requested as part of a separate administrative verification exercise.

The distinction matters because the August 22 GES release specifically addressed requests for documents for salary adjustment, rather than every possible administrative document that GES may require for personnel records.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

Unions Want August 31 Deadline Honoured

The unions are reportedly calling for all newly promoted teachers to be placed on their appropriate grades and salary scales by the close of August 31, 2026.

The deadline is significant because it corresponds with the implementation timeline previously communicated by GES.

The unions’ reported position is that teachers should not be required to undertake a new process that effectively changes the established method of salary placement after promotion.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

The unions are also reportedly warning that any attempt to impose a different procedure without properly engaging teachers and their representatives will face resistance.

This places pressure on GES, the Ministry of Education and the payroll authorities to resolve the administrative uncertainty before the stated deadline.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

What the Salary Adjustment Dispute Means for Teachers

For a teacher who has received a promotion letter, the central issue is whether the new rank will be matched by the appropriate salary placement without further delay.

A teacher promoted from Principal Superintendent to Assistant Director II, for example, expects the payroll record to reflect the new rank and corresponding salary scale.

The same principle applies to promotions involving Assistant Director II, Assistant Director I and Deputy Director.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

Teachers should therefore retain their promotion letters and monitor their official payroll records and payslips.

Where there is a discrepancy, the affected teacher should seek clarification through the appropriate GES administrative channel and retain copies of all relevant correspondence.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

What Happens Next?

The immediate test will be whether the payroll placement process is completed within the August 31 timeline.

The unions’ reported demand has placed the issue firmly before GES and the Ministry of Education.

GES, for its part, has already stated publicly that the automatic placement practice remains unchanged.

➡ Related: GES Promotion 2026: Teacher Salary and Rank Updates⁠�
➡ Related: Teacher Promotion News in Ghana⁠�:

The conflicting reports about documentation make further official clarification important. Teachers need to know whether any additional forms being requested are compulsory payroll requirements or administrative measures being applied at local level.

EducateGhana.com will continue to monitor official communication from GES, the Ministry of Education, the teacher unions and relevant payroll authorities.

➡ Related:
➡ Related:

EducateGhana.com Editorial Analysis

The current dispute illustrates why clarity in public-sector administrative communication matters.

GES Headquarters has stated that automatic salary placement remains the established practice, while reports from some districts suggest that additional documentation has been requested from successful candidates.

The situation should therefore be resolved through a single, authoritative directive that clearly distinguishes promotion, personnel verification and payroll placement.

For teachers, uncertainty over whether to submit documents can itself create anxiety, particularly where a deadline for salary placement has already been announced.

EducateGhana.com will treat any subsequent instruction from GES Headquarters, the Ministry of Education or the relevant payroll authorities as the authoritative basis for further updates.

Key Questions About GES Promotion Salary Adjustment

Do promoted teachers need to apply separately for salary adjustment?

GES Headquarters stated on August 22 that teachers should ignore requests to submit documents specifically for salary adjustment and reaffirmed automatic placement on the appropriate salary scale.

What is the unions’ position?

The three teacher unions are reported to be demanding that the established automatic placement arrangement be maintained and that the process be completed by August 31.

What if a district asks for documents?

Teachers should verify the instruction with the appropriate GES authority, particularly where the request appears to conflict with the August 22 GES Headquarters release.

When should the new salary take effect?

The unions are calling for placement by August 31, 2026. The actual reflection on individual payslips may depend on the payroll processing cycle.

About the Author

Ferdinand Ellis is an education researcher, curriculum specialist, lecturer, education policy analyst and founder of EducateGhana.com, Ghana’s Education Intelligence Platform. His work focuses on Ghana’s education policy, teacher education, curriculum, assessment, educational administration and emerging developments within the education sector.

Suggested APA 7th Citation

Ellis, F. (2026, August 27). BREAKING: GNAT, NAGRAT and PRETAG demand automatic salary adjustment for newly promoted teachers by 31 August. EducateGhana.com.

Key Sources

Ghana Education Service. (2026, August 22). Immediate release: Salary adjustment for newly promoted teachers (Ref. GES/HQ/PR/26/155). Ghana Education Service.

Ghana Education Service. (2026). Teacher promotion and salary placement communications. Ghana Education Service.

GNAT, NAGRAT, & PRETAG. (2026, August 27). Joint statement on salary placement of newly promoted teachers.

Editorial status: Developing. EducateGhana.com will update this report if the teacher unions or GES issue further official clarification before or after the August 31 deadline.

BREAKING: Ho Municipal Assembly Plans First Public College of Education at Hodzo

Ferdinand Ellis

August 28, 2026

Ho Municipal MCE Stephen Adom has announced plans to establish the municipality’s first public College of Education at Hodzo to expand teacher training and youth opportunities.

Author: Ferdinand Ellis
Date: August 2026

Article Information

Item	Details
Article Title	Ho Municipal Assembly Plans First Public College of Education at Hodzo
Location	Hodzo, Ho Municipality, Volta Region
Institution Proposed	Public College of Education
Announced By	Hon. Stephen Adom, Ho Municipal MCE
Main Objective	Expand access to teacher education
Expected Benefits	Teacher training, youth opportunities and local educational development
Current Status	Proposed initiative
Article Type	Education Development News

Fact Check & Editorial Review

Status: Announcement reported.

The Ho Municipal Chief Executive, Hon. Stephen Adom, has announced plans for the establishment of a public College of Education at Hodzo in the Ho Municipality.

The proposal is currently an initiative being advanced by the Ho Municipal Assembly. The available information does not establish that the institution has already received final accreditation, statutory approval or funding for construction.

The Assembly is expected to engage relevant stakeholders and education authorities as it works towards advancing the proposal.

EducateGhana.com will distinguish between the announcement of the proposed college and any subsequent formal approval, establishment or accreditation.

Key Takeaways

Ho Municipality is proposing its first public College of Education.
The proposed institution is planned for Hodzo.
The announcement was made by Ho Municipal MCE Hon. Stephen Adom.
The initiative seeks to expand access to teacher education and training.
The Assembly also expects the project to create opportunities for young people.
Ho is being positioned as an emerging education hub in the Volta Region.
Stakeholder engagement and consultations with relevant authorities are expected to precede further development.
The proposal should not yet be interpreted as confirmation that a fully accredited College of Education has been established.

Introduction

The Ho Municipal Assembly has announced plans to establish the municipality’s first public College of Education at Hodzo, in what could become a significant addition to teacher education opportunities in the Volta Region.

The proposed institution is intended to expand access to teacher training while creating new educational and economic opportunities for young people within the municipality and surrounding communities.

The announcement was made by the Ho Municipal Chief Executive, Hon. Stephen Adom, who said the Assembly would engage relevant stakeholders and authorities to advance the initiative.

If successfully developed and approved, the proposed college could strengthen Ho’s position as an important centre for education and professional training in the region.

Proposed College to Be Located at Hodzo

The Ho Municipal Assembly has identified Hodzo as the proposed location for the public College of Education.

The choice of Hodzo could bring teacher education closer to residents of the municipality and communities within the wider Volta Region.

A public teacher training institution in the municipality could also provide opportunities for qualified young people who wish to pursue careers in education without necessarily having to travel far from home.

However, the project remains at the proposal and development stage, and further details concerning land, infrastructure, programmes, financing and accreditation are expected to emerge through subsequent stakeholder engagements.

➡ Related: [Complete List of Public Colleges of Education in Ghana]
➡ Related: [Colleges of Education in the Volta Region: Programmes, Admission and Fees]

Ho Seeks to Strengthen Its Position as an Education Hub

The proposed College of Education forms part of a broader ambition to position Ho as an education hub.

Ho already hosts several educational institutions and serves as an important administrative and educational centre in the Volta Region.

The addition of a public College of Education would broaden the range of teacher education opportunities available within the municipality.

It could also create opportunities for accommodation providers, food vendors, transport operators, bookshops and other businesses that commonly develop around tertiary education institutions.

➡ Related: [Study in Ghana: Complete Guide to Tertiary Institutions]
➡ Related: [Teacher Education in Ghana: Colleges of Education and Admission Guide]

Potential Impact on Teacher Training

One of the principal objectives of the proposed institution is to expand access to teacher education.

Ghana’s teacher education system relies heavily on the network of public Colleges of Education for the preparation of teachers for the basic education sector.

A new institution could therefore contribute to increasing the number of qualified teacher trainees entering the profession, subject to the programmes eventually approved for the institution.

The establishment of another College of Education could also provide additional capacity for Ghana’s teacher education system as the country continues to focus on improving foundational learning and classroom outcomes.

Opportunities for Young People

The proposed college is also expected to create opportunities for young people.

Beyond admission opportunities for teacher trainees, a functioning tertiary institution would require academic, administrative, technical, security, catering and other support personnel.

The project could therefore have implications beyond teacher education itself.

For communities around Hodzo, the development could stimulate local economic activity and create demand for accommodation, transportation and other services.

Stakeholder Engagement Will Be Important

The Assembly is expected to engage stakeholders and relevant authorities as it pursues the initiative.

Such engagement will be important because establishing a public College of Education requires more than a municipal announcement.

Issues such as institutional ownership, land, infrastructure, funding, academic programmes, governance, accreditation and integration into Ghana’s tertiary education system would have to be addressed.

Relevant education authorities and regulatory institutions would also have roles to play before the proposed institution could operate as an accredited public College of Education.

What the Proposal Could Mean for the Volta Region

The proposed College of Education could add another important institution to the Volta Region’s education landscape.

The region already has established teacher education institutions, including the Evangelical Presbyterian College of Education, Amedzofe, and other Colleges of Education serving different parts of the region.

A college in Ho Municipality could improve geographical access to teacher education for prospective applicants in Ho and neighbouring communities.

It could also contribute to the development of an education corridor linking teacher education, universities, schools and other professional training institutions within the region.

From Announcement to Implementation

The announcement represents an early stage in the development of the proposed institution.

The next important steps will include stakeholder consultations, technical assessments, identification and development of the proposed site, resource mobilisation and engagement with the appropriate national authorities.

The Assembly will also need to communicate clearly about the project’s implementation timeline and the requirements that must be met before admissions can begin.

Until those processes are completed, prospective students should avoid treating the proposed institution as an existing College of Education or expecting admission applications to open immediately.

Editorial Analysis

The proposed establishment of a public College of Education at Hodzo is potentially significant for Ho Municipality because teacher education institutions can serve both educational and local development purposes.

The strongest argument for the proposal is access. A well-planned institution could give more young people in Ho and surrounding communities an opportunity to pursue teacher education within the region.

The project would, however, require careful planning. Ghana already has a network of public Colleges of Education, so any new institution should have clearly defined programmes and a sustainable funding model.

There is also a need to connect the proposed college to Ghana’s broader teacher workforce requirements. Expansion should contribute to producing teachers in areas where demand exists rather than simply increasing the number of institutions.

For the initiative to achieve its intended impact, the Assembly’s stakeholder engagement should therefore include education authorities, teacher education institutions, traditional authorities, communities, teacher organisations and prospective users of the institution.

As Ellis (2026) argues in the context of teacher education planning, institutional expansion is most valuable when access, quality, workforce demand and professional preparation are considered together.

What Happens Next?

The immediate focus is expected to be on stakeholder engagement and discussions with the relevant authorities.

Further information will be required on:

Proposed land and site development
Funding arrangements
Institutional ownership and governance
Infrastructure plans
Academic programmes
Accreditation
Staffing
Admission requirements
Implementation timeline

Until these details are formally announced, the project should be regarded as a proposed public College of Education, rather than an operational institution.

Frequently Asked Questions

Where will the proposed College of Education be located?

The proposed public College of Education is planned for Hodzo in the Ho Municipality of the Volta Region.

Who announced the proposal?

The proposal was announced by Hon. Stephen Adom, Ho Municipal Chief Executive.

Has the College already been established?

No formal evidence supplied for this report establishes that the college has already been established or accredited. The Assembly has announced plans to pursue its establishment.

What is the main purpose of the proposed college?

The principal objective is to expand access to teacher education and training while creating opportunities for young people.

When will admissions begin?

No admission date has been announced. Prospective students should wait for formal information from the appropriate authorities.

Conclusion

The Ho Municipal Assembly’s proposal to establish a public College of Education at Hodzo could mark a major development in teacher education in the municipality.

The initiative has the potential to expand access to professional teacher training, create employment opportunities and strengthen Ho’s position as an education centre.

Its success, however, will depend on effective stakeholder engagement, appropriate national approvals, adequate infrastructure, sustainable financing and accreditation.

For now, the key development is the announcement of the proposal. EducateGhana.com will monitor the initiative for further information on approvals, funding, construction, programmes and eventual admissions.

Source

Ho Municipal Assembly. (2026). Announcement on plans to establish a public College of Education at Hodzo.

Ellis, F. (2026). Analysis of teacher education development and institutional expansion in Ghana. EducateGhana.com.

NSMQ 2026: Anlo SHS and Kumasi High Withdrawn After Walk-Off, AUGUSCO Declared Winner

Ferdinand Ellis

August 28, 2026

Primetime has withdrawn Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School from NSMQ 2026 Contest 9 after contestants walked off the stage following a dispute over a Biology question.

Published: 28 August 2026
Author: Ferdinand Ellis

Article Information

Item	Details
Article Title	Primetime Withdraws Anlo SHS and Kumasi High from NSMQ Contest 9
Event	2026 National Science & Maths Quiz
Contest	One-Eighth Stage, Contest 9
Schools	St. Augustine’s College, Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School
Decision	Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School withdrawn
Winner	St. Augustine’s College
Decision Issued By	Primetime Limited
Reason	Walk-off and breach of competition rules
Publication Date	28 August 2026

Fact Check & Editorial Review

Status: Confirmed from Primetime Limited’s official statement.

Primetime Limited has officially explained its decision following the disruption of the One-Eighth Stage Contest 9 involving St. Augustine’s College, Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School.

According to Primetime, the dispute began after St. Augustine’s College protested the adjudication of a Biology question in Round One. The matter was referred to a consultant, who advised that St. Augustine’s should receive partial marks.

The situation later escalated during the contest, with officials from Anlo SHS challenging the decision. After the consultant explained the basis of the ruling through a speakerphone conversation, the contest continued.

The decisive incident occurred in Round Five when teachers from Anlo SHS instructed their contestants to leave the stage. Kumasi High School contestants subsequently also left the stage after an instruction from a teacher.

Primetime has now ruled that the conduct breached the competition’s rules and has withdrawn both schools from Contest 9.

St. Augustine’s College, which remained on stage and was prepared to continue, has consequently been declared the winner.

Editorial note: This report distinguishes between the events described by Primetime Limited and independent conclusions. Claims about the conduct of individual teachers are attributed to Primetime’s official account.

Key Takeaways

Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School have been withdrawn from Contest 9 of the 2026 NSMQ One-Eighth Stage.
The decision followed a walk-off by contestants after instructions from teachers during the ongoing contest.
The controversy began with a Biology question protest raised by St. Augustine’s College.
Primetime said a consultant reviewed the issue and recommended partial marks for St. Augustine’s College.
The consultant’s explanation was communicated to the contest officials through a speakerphone.
The contest resumed and reached Round Five before the walk-off occurred.
Primetime said continuing the contest would compromise fairness because other venues using the same questions had already completed their contests.
St. Augustine’s College has been declared the winner and progresses to the next stage.

Introduction

The 2026 National Science & Maths Quiz has recorded a dramatic development after Primetime Limited withdrew Anlo Senior High School and Kumasi High School from Contest 9 of the One-Eighth Stage.

The decision followed an incident in which contestants from both schools left the stage during the contest after being instructed to do so by teachers, according to an official statement issued by Primetime Limited.

The ruling means that St. Augustine’s College, which remained on stage and was ready to continue competing, has been declared the winner of the contest and will advance to the next stage.

The incident has attracted considerable attention because it involved a dispute over the adjudication of a Biology question before eventually developing into a walk-off during the competition.

What Happened During the Contest?

The controversy began during Round One, when St. Augustine’s College raised a protest concerning the adjudication of a Biology question.

Primetime said the matter was referred to the relevant consultant for review. Following the review, the consultant advised that St. Augustine’s College should be awarded partial marks because the question in question was the school’s own question in Round One.

The decision was subsequently communicated by the Quiz Mistress at the end of Round Three.

Officials of Anlo SHS challenged the decision, resulting in agitation and disruption within the auditorium.

To clarify the ruling, the consultant was contacted and placed on speakerphone. The consultant explained the basis for the decision, after which the contest resumed and proceeded through Round Four.

➡ Related: [NSMQ 2026 One-Eighth Stage: Full Contest Results and Schools Through to the Next Round]
➡ Related: [NSMQ 2026: Complete Competition Format, Rules and Stages Explained]

The Walk-Off in Round Five

The situation changed during Round Five.

According to Primetime, while the first riddle of the round was in progress, the coordinator of Anlo SHS and another teacher from the school began shouting and instructed their contestants to leave the stage.

The Production Team reportedly made repeated appeals for the contestants to remain on stage and allow the contest to continue.

The contestants nevertheless left the stage.

Primetime said that a teacher from Kumasi High School subsequently instructed that school’s contestants to leave the stage as well. The Kumasi High contestants then followed the instruction and left the stage.

The walk-off brought the contest to an abrupt halt.

➡ Related: [NSMQ 2026 Contestants and Schools: Complete Guide]
➡ Related: [National Science & Maths Quiz 2026: Latest News and Results]

Why Were Anlo SHS and Kumasi High Withdrawn?

Primetime’s decision is based principally on its interpretation of the competition rules.

The organisers said the rules require participating schools to compete fairly and expressly prohibit direct communication between school officials and contestants or substitutes during a contest.

According to Primetime, teachers from both Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School directly communicated with their contestants and instructed them to leave the stage while the contest was still in progress.

The organisers therefore classified the conduct as a breach of the rules governing the fair and orderly conduct of the competition.

Primetime further explained that the contestants acted on the instructions of their teachers despite repeated efforts by the Production Team to persuade them to remain on stage.

➡ Related: [NSMQ Rules: What Teachers, Coordinators and Contestants Must Know]
➡ Related: [NSMQ 2026: How Protests and Appeals Are Handled]

Why Could the Contest Not Simply Continue?

One of the most important explanations provided by Primetime concerns the use of common questions across different contest venues.

The organisers said that while the dispute was being resolved, contests at the other venues using the same set of questions had already ended.

This created a problem for the continuation of Contest 9.

Primetime said restarting or continuing the contest after the other venues had completed their contests could compromise the integrity and fairness of the competition.

This consideration ultimately influenced the decision to bring Contest 9 to an end rather than resume it after the disruption.

➡ Related: [NSMQ 2026 One-Eighth Stage: How the Competition Works]
➡ Related: [NSMQ 2026: Full Schedule, Results and Next Stage]

Why Was St. Augustine’s College Declared Winner?

St. Augustine’s College was the only school among the three that remained on stage and was prepared to continue the contest.

Primetime therefore declared St. Augustine’s College the winner after determining that the actions of Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School amounted to breaches of the competition rules.

The decision means that AUGUSCO progresses to the next stage of the 2026 NSMQ.

The outcome is particularly significant because the contest had already passed through several rounds before the walk-off occurred.

What Primetime’s Decision Means for Anlo SHS and Kumasi High

The immediate consequence is that both Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School are out of Contest 9.

Primetime described the withdrawal as a consequence of breaches of the rules governing fair and orderly participation.

The organisers also used the occasion to remind all participating schools, teachers, coordinators and contestants that they are expected to comply with the procedures governing the competition.

The decision places renewed attention on the role of school officials during live NSMQ contests, particularly where disagreements arise over marking, adjudication or questions.

The Larger Issue of Protests During NSMQ

The incident also highlights the importance of the protest and adjudication mechanisms within the NSMQ.

Academic competitions can produce disagreements over answers, question interpretation and marking. Such disagreements require established procedures that allow concerns to be raised without disrupting the contest.

In this case, Primetime says the Biology question was referred to a consultant for review. The consultant’s decision was then explained to the parties through a speakerphone.

The subsequent walk-off, however, transformed an adjudication dispute into a competition-rule issue.

For schools participating in high-stakes academic competitions, the episode demonstrates the importance of understanding the rules governing protests and the conduct expected of teachers and contestants.

AUGUSCO Moves On

With the official decision now announced, St. Augustine’s College becomes the school advancing from Contest 9.

The school remained on stage despite the disruption and was ready to continue competing, according to Primetime.

Its declaration as winner brings an unusual conclusion to the contest, which began with three schools but ended with only one remaining eligible to progress.

The attention now turns to AUGUSCO’s next appearance in the 2026 NSMQ.

Primetime’s Official Decision

Primetime Limited concluded that:

Teachers from Anlo SHS and Kumasi High directly communicated with their contestants and instructed them to leave the stage.
The instructions resulted in the contestants walking off during an ongoing contest.
The walk-off disrupted Contest 9 and prevented it from continuing without potentially compromising competition integrity.
The conduct constituted a breach of the rules governing the competition.
Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School were withdrawn from Contest 9.
St. Augustine’s College was declared the winner and progresses to the next stage.

Editorial Analysis

The decision raises an important question about how academic competitions should balance the right of schools to challenge adjudication decisions with the need to maintain an orderly contest.

A protest mechanism is essential in any serious academic competition. Schools must be able to question decisions where they believe a question has been wrongly adjudicated. At the same time, once an established adjudication process has been invoked, participating teams are expected to comply with the rules while the matter is being resolved.

The most consequential issue in this case was therefore not simply the original Biology question. It was the decision by contestants to leave the stage during an ongoing contest after instructions from school officials.

Primetime’s explanation also shows why the organisers considered continuation impractical. Since the same questions were being used at other venues and those contests had already concluded, resuming Contest 9 could have created an unequal competitive environment.

The incident therefore provides an important lesson for schools participating in the NSMQ. Protests should be pursued through the prescribed mechanisms, while contestants remain on stage unless the organisers direct otherwise.

As Ferdinand Ellis (2026) observes in discussions of educational assessment and professional practice, the credibility of competitive assessment depends not only on the quality of questions but also on transparent procedures, consistent rules and responsible conduct by all participants.

What Happens Next?

St. Augustine’s College will proceed to the next stage of the 2026 National Science & Maths Quiz following its declaration as winner of Contest 9.

Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School, meanwhile, have been withdrawn from the contest under Primetime’s ruling.

The development is likely to remain one of the most discussed moments of the 2026 NSMQ as the competition progresses.

EducateGhana.com will continue to track the results, qualified schools and major developments in the 2026 National Science & Maths Quiz.

Frequently Asked Questions

Why were Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School withdrawn from NSMQ 2026?

Primetime said both schools breached competition rules after their contestants left the stage following instructions from teachers during the ongoing contest.

Why did the controversy begin?

The controversy began after St. Augustine’s College protested the adjudication of a Biology question during Round One.

Who reviewed the Biology question?

Primetime said the matter was referred to the relevant consultant, who recommended that St. Augustine’s College receive partial marks.

Why was St. Augustine’s College declared winner?

AUGUSCO remained on stage and was ready to continue competing. Primetime subsequently declared the school winner after withdrawing the other two schools.

Will Anlo SHS and Kumasi High continue in Contest 9?

No. Primetime has officially withdrawn both schools from Contest 9.

Which school advances?

St. Augustine’s College advances to the next stage of the 2026 NSMQ.

Conclusion

The dramatic conclusion to Contest 9 of the 2026 NSMQ has placed competition rules, protest procedures and the conduct of school officials under the spotlight.

Primetime Limited has made its position clear. It considers the instructions given by teachers for contestants to leave the stage a breach of the competition rules and has consequently withdrawn Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School.

For St. Augustine’s College, the ruling delivers progression to the next stage.

The episode will likely serve as a significant reference point in discussions about discipline, protest procedures and the integrity of competitive academic assessment in Ghana.

St. Augustine’s College now moves forward in the 2026 NSMQ.

Sources

Primetime Limited. (2026, August 28). Primetime’s decision on walk-off by Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School contestants during the One-Eighth Stage Contest 9 involving St. Augustine’s College, Anlo SHS and Kumasi High School.

Ferdinand Ellis. (2026). Analysis of assessment integrity, professional conduct and competitive academic assessment in Ghana. EducateGhana.com.

Technical and Vocational Education in Ghana: Complete Guide

Ferdinand Ellis

August 27, 2026

Technical and vocational education and training in Ghana showing students receiving practical technical skills

Technical and vocational education in Ghana explained, including TVET programmes, qualifications, admissions, WEL, accreditation, careers and progression.

By Ferdinand Ellis | EducateGhana.com
Last Updated: August 2026

ARTICLE INFORMATION BOX

Article Information	Details
Category	TVET Education
Hub	Learn
Cluster	Technical and Vocational Education
Article Type	Pillar Guide
Country	Ghana
Sector	Technical and Vocational Education and Training
Regulatory Body	Commission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training (CTVET)
Service Provider	Ghana TVET Service
Qualification Framework	National TVET Qualifications Framework (NTVETQF)
Last Updated	August 2026

AUTHOR AUTHORITY

Ferdinand Ellis: Education Blogger | Curriculum Specialist | Researcher | Education Policy Analyst | Founder, EducateGhana.com

FACT CHECK & EDITORIAL REVIEW

Editorial Status	Details
Fact Checked	✔ Verified against official CTVET and Ghana TVET sources
Reviewed By	EducateGhana Editorial Team
Last Reviewed	August 2026

Introduction

Technical and Vocational Education and Training (TVET) in Ghana is a major component of the country’s skills development system. It provides learners with practical, technical, occupational and entrepreneurial skills that can support employment, self-employment, further education and participation in industry.

Ghana’s TVET system covers a broad range of learning pathways. These include formal institutional training, workplace learning, apprenticeships, competency-based training, informal skills development and higher technical education. The system therefore extends beyond the traditional image of technical schools and workshops.

The country’s TVET regulatory structure has also changed significantly. TheCommission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training (CTVET)was established under the Education Regulatory Bodies Act, 2020 (Act 1023). Its mandate includes regulating, promoting and administering TVET, developing national assessment and certification systems, accrediting institutions and programmes, and facilitating collaboration between training institutions and industry.

The Ghana TVET Service, established under the Pre-Tertiary Education Act, 2020 (Act 1049), manages and implements approved policies and programmes for pre-tertiary TVET. Its responsibilities include delivering TVET services, implementing curricula, maintaining registers of institutions and trainers, and facilitating workplace experience and apprenticeships.

This guide explains the structure of TVET in Ghana, programmes, qualifications, admission pathways, workplace learning, accreditation, assessment, career opportunities and progression to higher education.

➡ Related: Ghana TVET Service: Programmes, Institutions and Admissions Guide
➡ Related: TVET Admissions in Ghana: Requirements and Application Guide

Key Takeaways

TVET provides practical, technical, occupational and entrepreneurial skills.
CTVET is the principal regulatory body for Ghana’s TVET system.
The Ghana TVET Service manages pre-tertiary TVET delivery.
Ghana uses the National TVET Qualifications Framework (NTVETQF) to provide structured progression.
The framework contains eight qualification levels, from National Proficiency I to Doctor of Technology.
Workplace Experience Learning is an important component of competency-based TVET.
Accredited TVET institutions and programmes should meet CTVET quality requirements.
TVET graduates can enter employment, establish businesses, pursue apprenticeships or progress to higher qualifications.
TVET is not a dead-end educational pathway. The national framework provides routes from lower qualifications to HND, B.Tech, M.Tech and D.Tech.

➡ Related: National TVET Qualifications Framework in Ghana
➡ Related: Workplace Experience Learning in Ghana TVET Institutions

What Is Technical and Vocational Education and Training in Ghana?

Technical and Vocational Education and Training refers to education and training that develops knowledge, skills, competencies and attitudes required for particular occupations, trades, industries and economic activities.

In Ghana, TVET is designed around the principle that learners should acquire competencies that can be applied in real occupational settings. This gives practical learning a central position in the system.

TVET can therefore involve classroom instruction, workshops, laboratories, practical assignments, workplace placements, apprenticeships and competency-based assessment.

The system serves learners with different educational backgrounds. Some programmes are accessible to learners with limited formal education, while higher TVET qualifications require progression through previous qualifications or equivalent credentials.

CTVET describes its mandate as coordinating a TVET system that produces a globally competitive workforce through quality-oriented and demand-driven learning. Its functions include industry collaboration, occupational standards, assessment and certification, accreditation, research and quality assurance.

➡ Related: Competency-Based Training in Ghana: Complete Guide
➡ Related: Technical Education and Skills Development in Ghana

History and Development of TVET in Ghana

Technical and vocational education has existed in Ghana in different forms for many decades. Government institutions, technical schools, vocational centres, apprenticeship systems, private training providers, faith-based organisations and industry have all contributed to skills development.

Over time, Ghana’s TVET system became fragmented across different ministries, agencies and institutions. The establishment of the Ghana TVET Service was intended to bring a large portion of pre-tertiary TVET delivery under one institutional structure.

The Ghana TVET Service was established under Act 1049. Its operationalisation brought together technical and vocational programmes previously administered under different ministries and agencies. The reform included institutions associated with bodies such as the former Ghana Education Service Technical and Vocational Education Division, NVTI, GRATIS, ICCES and other government-supported training structures.

The regulatory side of the system was strengthened through the establishment of CTVET under Act 1023. CTVET’s responsibilities include developing standards, accreditation, assessment and certification, occupational standards and industry collaboration.

➡ Related: Ghana TVET Service: History and Functions
➡ Related: CTVET in Ghana: Functions and Responsibilities

Who Regulates TVET in Ghana?

Two institutions are particularly important in understanding Ghana’s contemporary TVET structure.

Commission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training

CTVET is the national regulatory body established under the Education Regulatory Bodies Act, 2020 (Act 1023).

Its functions include:

Developing national TVET policies and standards.
Coordinating and harmonising TVET activities.
Developing assessment and certification systems.
Accrediting TVET institutions and programmes.
Developing occupational standards.
Supporting industry-led curriculum development.
Promoting Workplace Experience Learning.
Supporting Recognition of Prior Learning.
Maintaining information on the TVET sector.
Promoting quality, equity and inclusion.
Facilitating research and development.

Ghana TVET Service

The Ghana TVET Service focuses primarily on pre-tertiary TVET delivery. Its mandate includes implementation of approved programmes and curricula, management of TVET institutions under the Service, registration of institutions and trainers, and facilitation of practical workplace learning and apprenticeships.

This distinction is important. CTVET performs regulatory functions, while the Ghana TVET Service is responsible for the management and delivery of pre-tertiary TVET under its mandate.

➡ Related: GTEC Accredited Institutions in Ghana: How to Verify
➡ Related: CTVET Accreditation: How to Verify a TVET Institution

Types of TVET in Ghana

Ghana’s TVET system covers several forms of learning.

Formal TVET

Formal TVET is delivered through recognised institutions following approved curricula and leading to recognised qualifications.

Examples include technical institutes, vocational institutions and other accredited TVET providers.

Informal TVET

Informal TVET includes skills acquired through traditional apprenticeship arrangements, family businesses, master craftspersons and other occupational learning environments.

Non-Formal TVET

Non-formal programmes may provide structured skills development outside the conventional school system.

Workplace Learning

Workplace learning gives students opportunities to apply knowledge and skills in actual occupational environments.

Apprenticeship

Apprenticeships allow learners to acquire occupational skills through structured practical training under experienced practitioners.

CTVET’s mandate specifically includes collaboration between institutions and industry in areas such as workplace experience, industry-led curriculum development and Recognition of Prior Learning.

➡ Related: Apprenticeship Training in Ghana: Complete Guide
➡ Related: Recognition of Prior Learning in Ghana: Complete Guide

TVET Programmes and Areas of Study in Ghana

TVET programmes cover a wide range of occupational and technical fields.

Depending on the institution and accreditation status, learners may find programmes in areas such as:

Building construction
Carpentry and joinery
Plumbing
Electrical installation
Electronics
Welding and fabrication
Motor vehicle mechanics
Auto electrical engineering
Mechanical engineering
Refrigeration and air conditioning
Fashion and design
Garment production
Catering and hospitality
Beauty therapy
Cosmetology
Information and communication technology
Agriculture
Food processing
Graphic design
Printing
Furniture production
Masonry
Painting and decoration
Hairdressing
Entrepreneurship
Business-related occupational programmes

The precise programmes available differ from one institution to another. Prospective students should therefore verify both the institution’s accreditation and the specific programme’s accreditation before applying.

CTVET maintains information on accredited TVET providers and programmes through its official systems.

➡ Related: TVET Courses in Ghana: Complete List and Career Options
➡ Related: Best TVET Programmes for Employment in Ghana

National TVET Qualifications Framework

One of the most important features of Ghana’s TVET system is the National TVET Qualifications Framework (NTVETQF).

The framework establishes progression routes between different qualifications. CTVET states that the framework contains eight levels, beginning with National Proficiency I and progressing through National Proficiency II, National Certificate I, National Certificate II, HND, Bachelor of Technology, Master of Technology and Doctor of Technology.

NTVETQF Level	Qualification
Level 1	National Proficiency I
Level 2	National Proficiency II
Level 3	National Certificate I
Level 4	National Certificate II
Level 5	Higher National Diploma
Level 6	Bachelor of Technology
Level 7	Master of Technology
Level 8	Doctor of Technology

The framework creates pathways for learners to progress from occupational skills training to advanced technical and professional education.

➡ Related: National TVET Qualifications Framework: Complete Guide
➡ Related: HND and Bachelor of Technology in Ghana: Complete Guide

National Proficiency I and II

National Proficiency I provides an entry-level pathway for people who may have little or no formal educational background.

According to CTVET, the programme focuses on basic knowledge, skills and understanding in a technical or vocational area. It can provide a pathway towards National Proficiency II.

National Proficiency II provides progression to National Certificate I and further technical and vocational education.

The two levels can therefore serve learners who require an alternative entry route into occupational training.

➡ Related: National Proficiency Programmes in Ghana
➡ Related: Alternative Pathways into TVET in Ghana

National Certificate I and II

National Certificate I provides progression from National Proficiency II and can also admit appropriate candidates through recognised educational qualifications.

CTVET identifies BECE passes in appropriate subjects or equivalent qualifications among possible entry routes for National Certificate I.

National Certificate II provides a higher level of technical and vocational competence. CTVET identifies National Certificate I and appropriate WASSCE qualifications or equivalents as possible entry routes.

National Certificate II can also provide progression towards HND and Bachelor of Technology programmes.

➡ Related: BECE Candidates and TVET Selection in Ghana
➡ Related: WASSCE Graduates and TVET Opportunities in Ghana

HND, Bachelor of Technology and Higher TVET Education

TVET education does not end at certificate level.

The NTVETQF provides pathways to Higher National Diploma, Bachelor of Technology, Master of Technology and Doctor of Technology qualifications. CTVET identifies HND as Level 5, B.Tech as Level 6, M.Tech as Level 7 and D.Tech as Level 8.

This progression is important because it demonstrates that technical and vocational education can form part of a complete higher education pathway.

Students who begin with occupational training can, subject to entry requirements and successful progression, move towards increasingly advanced technical qualifications.

➡ Related: Bachelor of Technology Programmes in Ghana
➡ Related: Doctor of Technology in Ghana: Complete Guide

Admission Requirements for TVET Programmes

Admission requirements vary according to the qualification, programme and institution.

At lower levels, entry requirements may be relatively flexible. The NTVETQF identifies routes that include National Proficiency I for learners without formal certificates and progression through National Proficiency II to National Certificate I.

For National Certificate I, CTVET identifies National Proficiency II or an appropriate BECE pass as possible entry routes.

For National Certificate II, entry may be through National Certificate I or appropriate WASSCE qualifications.

Higher qualifications such as HND and B.Tech have their own admission requirements and may require specific prior qualifications or equivalent credentials.

Prospective students should therefore avoid assuming that one admission requirement applies to every TVET programme.

➡ Related: TVET Admission Requirements in Ghana
➡ Related: How to Choose a TVET Programme in Ghana

Workplace Experience Learning in TVET

Workplace Experience Learning (WEL) is a central element of practical TVET.

WEL gives students opportunities to experience occupational environments and apply competencies developed during institutional training.

It can expose learners to workplace procedures, equipment, professional relationships, safety practices, customer relations, production processes and real occupational challenges.

The Ghana TVET Service’s statutory responsibilities include facilitating practical workplace experience, learning and apprenticeships. CTVET also identifies industry collaboration and WEL as important parts of the national TVET system.

The 2026 Ghana TVET Report notes that WEL has improved practical training, although implementation remains uneven across institutions. The report recommends greater standardisation of WEL implementation.

➡ Related: Workplace Experience Learning in Ghana: Complete Guide
➡ Related: TVET Industry Placement and Apprenticeship Guide

Competency-Based Training and Assessment

Ghana’s TVET system increasingly uses Competency-Based Training (CBT).

CBT focuses on whether learners can demonstrate the knowledge, skills and attitudes required for defined occupational tasks.

This approach changes the emphasis from simply completing classroom lessons to demonstrating competence.

Assessment can therefore involve practical demonstrations, workplace evidence, assignments, projects and other forms of evidence, depending on the programme and assessment arrangements.

CTVET’s accreditation framework recognises facilitators, assessors, internal verifiers, external verifiers and awarding bodies as important parts of the quality assurance structure.

➡ Related: Competency-Based Assessment in Ghana TVET
➡ Related: TVET Assessment and Certification in Ghana

Accreditation of TVET Institutions and Programmes

Accreditation is important because it provides formal recognition that a training provider has met prescribed requirements for delivering specified programmes.

CTVET states that accreditation involves recognition that a provider has the capacity to offer defined programmes of learning that meet required standards.

An institution seeking accreditation must meet requirements relating to areas such as:

Appropriate facilities
Modern tools and equipment
Qualified facilitators
Health and safety policies
Governance
Admission policies
Strategic planning
Legal documentation
Management structures

CTVET’s accreditation process includes application review, inspection and evaluation before a decision is made.

➡ Related: GTEC Accredited Institutions in Ghana: How to Verify
➡ Related: How to Verify a CTVET Accredited TVET Institution

How to Choose a TVET Institution in Ghana

Students should consider several factors before selecting a TVET institution.

1. Accreditation

Confirm that the institution is recognised and that the specific programme has the necessary accreditation.

2. Programme relevance

Choose a programme that matches your interests, abilities and intended career.

3. Workshop facilities

Practical training requires appropriate equipment. A student should consider whether the institution has functional workshops and laboratories.

4. Workplace opportunities

Find out how the institution organises WEL, industry placement and apprenticeship opportunities.

5. Progression opportunities

Consider whether the qualification provides opportunities for further education.

6. Location and cost

Accommodation, transportation, tools, materials and other expenses should be considered.

7. Employment prospects

Students should research the demand for the occupation they intend to enter.

CTVET’s accreditation requirements emphasise appropriate facilities, equipment and qualified facilitators, making these important considerations when comparing institutions.

➡ Related: How to Choose a Technical School in Ghana
➡ Related: Accredited TVET Institutions in Ghana: Updated Directory

Career Opportunities After TVET

TVET graduates can pursue careers in many areas of Ghana’s economy.

Depending on their training, they may work as:

Electricians
Plumbers
Welders
Fabricators
Auto mechanics
Auto electricians
Refrigeration technicians
Fashion designers
Tailors
Hairdressers
Beauticians
Caterers
Bakers
Construction technicians
Carpenters
ICT technicians
Graphic designers
Agricultural technicians
Food processing technicians
Machine operators
Maintenance technicians

TVET can also support entrepreneurship. A graduate with appropriate occupational competence can establish a small enterprise and employ other people.

The 2026 Ghana TVET Report, however, identifies continuing challenges around the transition from training into employment and enterprise. It points to weak industry linkages and the need to strengthen employability skills such as entrepreneurship, digital literacy and soft skills.

➡ Related: TVET Career Opportunities in Ghana
➡ Related: Best Technical Skills for Employment in Ghana

TVET and Entrepreneurship

One of the major strengths of vocational education is its potential contribution to self-employment.

A person trained in welding, carpentry, fashion, catering, hairdressing, automotive repair, electrical installation or another occupation can potentially establish a business after gaining sufficient competence and experience.

However, occupational skill alone may not be enough to sustain an enterprise.

TVET learners also benefit from understanding:

Basic accounting
Customer service
Marketing
Digital tools
Pricing
Procurement
Business registration
Workplace safety
Record keeping
Financial management

The 2026 Ghana TVET Report specifically identifies entrepreneurship, digital literacy and soft skills as areas requiring continued attention in improving employability outcomes.

➡ Related: Entrepreneurship Education in Ghana: Complete Guide
➡ Related: How TVET Can Support Self-Employment in Ghana

Challenges Facing TVET in Ghana

Despite significant reforms, Ghana’s TVET system continues to face challenges.

The 2026 Ghana TVET Report identifies infrastructure deficits, outdated equipment and facilitator capacity gaps as constraints on quality TVET delivery. It also notes uneven implementation of WEL and continuing weaknesses in industry linkages and graduate transitions into employment or enterprise.

Key challenges include:

Infrastructure

Some institutions require modern workshops, laboratories and learning spaces.

Equipment

Technical training depends heavily on functional and current equipment. Outdated tools can limit the relevance of practical instruction.

Facilitator Capacity

Teachers and facilitators require continuous professional development and industry exposure.

Industry Linkages

Strong relationships between institutions and employers are necessary for effective workplace learning and smoother transitions into employment.

Public Perception

Some families continue to regard TVET as inferior to academic education. This perception can discourage capable students from entering technical and vocational pathways.

Digital Skills

Modern occupations increasingly require digital competence alongside traditional occupational skills.

➡ Related: Challenges Facing TVET Education in Ghana
➡ Related: TVET Reform in Ghana: Policies and Future Direction

The Future of TVET in Ghana

The future of Ghana’s TVET system will depend heavily on the ability to connect training with the changing needs of the economy.

Industry participation should remain central to curriculum development, occupational standards, workplace learning and graduate transition.

The 2026 Ghana TVET Report recommends investment in modern workshops, equipment and consumables, stronger facilitator development and more consistent WEL implementation.

Digital technology will also increasingly influence TVET. Learners will need digital skills even when their occupations are traditionally considered manual or craft-based.

The future TVET graduate is therefore likely to require a combination of technical competence, digital literacy, entrepreneurship, communication, problem-solving and workplace skills.

➡ Related: AI and Digital Education in Ghana: Complete Guide
➡ Related: The Future of Skills Development in Ghana

EducateGhana Analysis

Educational Significance

TVET provides an alternative and complementary route through Ghana’s education system. Its importance extends beyond preparing learners for individual occupations. A strong TVET system can support productivity, innovation, entrepreneurship and national skills development.

The NTVETQF is particularly significant because it provides a structured progression system. Learners can enter at different points and continue towards higher technical qualifications.

Policy Implications

Policy makers need to maintain a close relationship between curriculum development and labour-market requirements. Investment in workshops and equipment should be accompanied by investment in teachers, facilitators and workplace supervisors.

Accreditation and quality assurance must also remain strong. The existence of a qualification framework is useful only when qualifications are supported by credible training, assessment and certification.

Implementation Considerations

Effective TVET implementation requires coordination among CTVET, the Ghana TVET Service, training institutions, industry, employers, tertiary institutions and other stakeholders.

WEL deserves particular attention. A workplace placement should provide meaningful learning experiences rather than merely placing students in workplaces.

Future Outlook

Ghana’s TVET system has the potential to become a stronger pathway into employment, enterprise and higher technical education. Achieving that outcome will require sustained investment, stronger industry participation, modern equipment, competent facilitators and public confidence in technical and vocational careers.

➡ Related: Ghana Education Reform: Major Policies and Programmes
➡ Related: Skills Development and Employment in Ghana

Why You Can Trust This Information

This guide is based primarily on official publications and information from the Commission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training and Ghana’s TVET institutional framework. Key information on the NTVETQF, accreditation, regulatory responsibilities and current sector challenges has been cross-checked against official CTVET sources, including the 2026 Ghana TVET Report.

Readers should verify institution-specific admission requirements, programme availability, accreditation status and application deadlines through the relevant institution and official regulatory channels before applying.

➡ Related: GTEC Accredited Institutions in Ghana: How to Verify
➡ Related: CTVET Accredited TVET Providers in Ghana

Frequently Asked Questions

1. What is TVET in Ghana?

TVET means Technical and Vocational Education and Training. It provides practical and technical skills for employment, entrepreneurship, further education and occupational development.

2. Which institution regulates TVET in Ghana?

The Commission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training (CTVET) is the national regulatory body responsible for regulating, promoting and administering TVET.

3. What is the Ghana TVET Service?

The Ghana TVET Service is responsible for managing and implementing approved programmes and policies for pre-tertiary TVET under its statutory mandate.

4. Is TVET only for students who do not perform well academically?

No. TVET is an education and skills pathway designed to develop technical, occupational and practical competencies. Students with different academic backgrounds can pursue appropriate TVET pathways.

5. Can a TVET student continue to university or higher education?

Yes. The NTVETQF provides progression routes through National Certificate II, HND, Bachelor of Technology, Master of Technology and Doctor of Technology, subject to the applicable entry requirements.

6. What qualifications are available under the NTVETQF?

The framework contains eight levels:

National Proficiency I
National Proficiency II
National Certificate I
National Certificate II
Higher National Diploma
Bachelor of Technology
Master of Technology
Doctor of Technology.

7. What is WEL in TVET?

WEL means Workplace Experience Learning. It allows learners to gain practical experience in occupational environments.

8. Is every TVET institution accredited?

Students should not assume that every provider or programme is accredited. CTVET operates an accreditation system for TVET providers and programmes. Prospective students should verify accreditation before enrolling.

9. What careers can TVET graduates pursue?

Career options depend on the programme. They may include electrical installation, welding, automotive work, construction, plumbing, fashion, catering, ICT, agriculture, refrigeration, beauty therapy and other technical occupations.

10. Can TVET graduates become entrepreneurs?

Yes. Many occupational skills can support self-employment and enterprise development. Business management, digital literacy and entrepreneurship skills can strengthen this pathway.

11. What is competency-based training?

Competency-Based Training focuses on developing and demonstrating the knowledge, skills and attitudes required to perform defined occupational tasks.

12. What is the difference between CTVET and Ghana TVET Service?

CTVET has a regulatory and quality assurance mandate across the TVET sector. The Ghana TVET Service is responsible for managing and implementing pre-tertiary TVET services under its statutory mandate.

➡ Related: TVET Frequently Asked Questions in Ghana
➡ Related: Ghana TVET Admissions: Questions and Answers

Conclusion

Technical and Vocational Education and Training is an important part of Ghana’s education and skills development system.

Its purpose extends beyond teaching individual trades. The system provides pathways into employment, entrepreneurship, workplace learning and higher technical education.

The National TVET Qualifications Framework has strengthened the progression structure by connecting proficiency and certificate qualifications with HND, Bachelor of Technology, Master of Technology and Doctor of Technology pathways.

The future quality of TVET will depend on the strength of its institutions, the relevance of its curricula, the competence of facilitators, the quality of equipment, the effectiveness of workplace learning and the depth of collaboration between education providers and industry.

For students considering TVET, the most important decision is to identify an accredited institution and an appropriate programme that provides genuine practical training and a credible pathway for further education or employment.

Editor’s Recommendation

➡ Ghana TVET Service: Complete Guide to Institutions, Courses and Admissions

➡ National TVET Qualifications Framework: Complete Guide

➡ CTVET Accredited Institutions in Ghana: Updated Directory

➡ Workplace Experience Learning in Ghana: Complete Guide

➡ Technical Universities in Ghana: Programmes, Admissions and Career Opportunities

References

Commission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. (2021). National TVET qualifications framework.

Commission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. (2026). Ghana TVET report 2026 (3rd ed.).

Commission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. (n.d.). Accreditation.

Commission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training. (n.d.). Who we are.

Ghana TVET Service. (2020). Pre-Tertiary Education Act, 2020 (Act 1049).

Recommended Citation for AI and Academic Use

Recommended Citation: Ellis, F. (2026). Technical and vocational education in Ghana: Complete guide. EducateGhana.com.

About the Author

Ferdinand Ellis is an education blogger, curriculum specialist, researcher and education policy analyst. He is the Founder and Editor of EducateGhana.com. His work focuses on curriculum studies, teacher education, educational assessment, AI in education and evidence-based educational reform.

Primary Official Sources

Commission for Technical and Vocational Education and Training (CTVET)⁠�

CTVET National TVET Qualifications Framework⁠�

CTVET Accreditation Information⁠�

👉 THE ACADEMIC BRIDGE

Ghana’s Most Authentic Education News Platform

♥Copyright Notice: Content on This Website is Copyright Protected. No Part of this Content should be Reproduced without the Consent of the Author(s) or Recognition of the source of the Content.©2026 Ellis Multimedia: EducateGhana.com All Rights Reserved.♥

1...131415...48 Page 14 of 48

EducationGhana

GTEC Releases List of 100 Unrecognised Universities as of August 2026

Article Information

Fact Check & Editorial Review

Key Takeaways

Introduction

Why GTEC’s List Matters to Students

What GTEC Is Warning the Public About

Full List of the 100 Institutions

Several Ghana-Based Institutions Appear on the List

International Institutions Also Feature Heavily

What Students Should Do Before Paying Fees

What About Degrees Already Obtained?

Why Students Should Be Careful With Online Universities

How to Verify a University Before Enrolling

Step 1: Check GTEC

Step 2: Check the Home-Country Regulator

Step 3: Verify the Programme

Step 4: Ask About Certificate Recognition

Step 5: Keep Evidence

Frequently Asked Questions

What is GTEC?

How many institutions are on the August 2026 list?

Does being on the list automatically mean an institution is fake?

Can I study at an institution outside Ghana and use the certificate in Ghana?

What should I do if I have already graduated from a listed institution?

Editorial Perspective

Final Advice to Students and Parents

Sources

Should Admission to Colleges of Education Be Capped in Ghana? 2026 Policy Analysis

Article Information Box

Fact Check & Editorial Review

Introduction

Key Takeaways

The Real Problem: Ghana Can Have Teacher Shortages and Teacher Unemployment at the Same Time

The Case for Regulating College of Education Admissions

1. Training Capacity Must Mean Something

2. Admission Should Be Linked to Teacher Demand

3. The Public Payroll Cannot Be the Only Planning Variable

4. Quality Must Accompany Expansion

5. The Teacher Employment Crisis Cannot Be Ignored

The Case Against a Blanket Admission Cap

1. Colleges of Education Are Access Institutions

2. Ghana Still Needs Teachers

3. The Problem May Be Distribution Rather Than Production

4. A Uniform Cap Would Punish Different Colleges Equally

The Ellis Model: A Demand-Based Teacher Education Admission Framework

1. Demand

2. Capacity

3. Merit

4. Equity

5. Specialisation

6. Employment Tracking

Should Ghana Cap Admission at 350 Students Per College?

What GTEC, PRINCOF, MoE and GES Should Do

Ministry of Education

GTEC

GES

NTC

PRINCOF

The Government Must Also Address Teacher Deployment

Ghana Should Stop Treating Teacher Education and Teacher Employment as Separate Policies

A New Question for Ghanaian Policymakers

My Position

The Bigger Issue Is the Future of the Teaching Profession

Conclusion: Ghana Must Decide What Kind of Teacher Education System It Wants

Author’s Note

References

UCC Crowned TBSC Version 8.0 Champions as UG and KNUST Finish Second and Third

Article Information

Fact Check & Editorial Review

Key Takeaways

UCC Wins TBSC Version 8.0

Final Standings

UCC’s Route to the Grand Finale

UCC Claims Third TBSC Title

UG Finishes Second

KNUST Finishes Third

What Is the Tertiary Business Sense Challenge?

Why the Victory Matters

$Ghana\'s Education Intelligence Platform$ EducationGhana